Alpha 2.0
Login Register
» Articles » PMID: 39716132

An Umbrella Review of the Prevalence of Depression During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Call to Action for Post-COVID-19 at the Global Level

Overview
Journal BMC Public Health
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2024 Dec 23
PMID 39716132
Authors
Mohammad Mohseni
Saber Azami-Aghdash
Salman Bashzar
Haleh Mousavi Isfahani
Elaheh Parnian
Mostafa Amini-Rarani
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Pandemics can lead to mental health problems such as depression. This meta-analysis of meta-analyses aimed to estimate the precise prevalence of depression during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were searched for published meta-analyses using relevant keywords, such as depression, prevalence, COVID-19, and meta-analysis up to March 18, 2024 according to the PRISMA guidelines. Relevant journals as well as the search engine Google Scholar were manually searched to discover more articles. The AMSTAR tool was used for quality assessment. A random-effects model was used for the analysis. All analyses were conducted using the STATA 17 software.

Results: Of 535 records, 82 meta-analyses were included. The results showed that the overall prevalence of depression was 30% [95% CI: 29-32] with a high heterogeneity (I: 90.98%). The highest prevalence of depression according to population group was found in medical students (40% [30-49]), specific groups (40% [3-78]), and patients (36% [27-45]). The results of meta-regression based on the different times between the start of COVID-19 and the last date of search in the articles (week) and the prevalence of depression, showed that each past week of Covid-19 increases the prevalence of depression by almost 0.00021% [95% CI: -0.00025, 0.00068], P-value: 0.36, but "time" is not a significant predictor of an increase in depression.

Conclusions: The results showed that the prevalence of depression was high during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly among medical students. Policy makers should pay more attention to these groups and those who are at greater risk. Primary mental health interventions and policies are necessary to support the mental health of these individuals during the pandemic.

References
1.
Chen J, Zhang S, Yin A, Yanez J . Mental health symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic in developing countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Health. 2022; 12:05011. PMC: 9126304. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.12.05011. View
2.
Ghazanfarpour M, Bahrami F, Fakari F, Ashrafinia F, Babakhanian M, Dordeh M . Prevalence of anxiety and depression among pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic: a meta-analysis. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2021; 43(3):315-326. DOI: 10.1080/0167482X.2021.1929162. View
3.
Ghahramani S, Kasraei H, Hayati R, Tabrizi R, Marzaleh M . Health care workers' mental health in the face of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2022; 27(2):208-217. DOI: 10.1080/13651501.2022.2101927. View
4.
Safi-Keykaleh M, Aliakbari F, Safarpour H, Safari M, Tahernejad A, Sheikhbardsiri H . Prevalence of postpartum depression in women amid the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022; 157(2):240-247. PMC: 9087783. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14129. View
5.
Shea B, Grimshaw J, Wells G, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C . Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007; 7:10. PMC: 1810543. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-10. View