» Articles » PMID: 33798961

Macropore Design of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds Regulates Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation Fate

Overview
Journal Biomaterials
Date 2021 Apr 2
PMID 33798961
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Craniosynostosis is a debilitating birth defect characterized by the premature fusion of cranial bones resulting from premature loss of stem cells located in suture tissue between growing bones. Mesenchymal stromal cells in long bone and the cranial suture are known to be multipotent cell sources in the appendicular skeleton and cranium, respectively. We are developing biomaterial constructs to maintain stemness of the cranial suture cell population towards an ultimate goal of diminishing craniosynostosis patient morbidity. Recent evidence suggests that physical features of synthetic tissue engineering scaffolds modulate cell and tissue fate. In this study, macroporous tissue engineering scaffolds with well-controlled spherical pores were fabricated by a sugar porogen template method. Cell-scaffold constructs were implanted subcutaneously in mice for up to eight weeks then assayed for mineralization, vascularization, extracellular matrix composition, and gene expression. Pore size differentially regulates cell fate, where sufficiently large pores provide an osteogenic niche adequate for bone formation, while sufficiently small pores (<125 μm in diameter) maintain stemness and prevent differentiation. Cell-scaffold constructs cultured in vitro followed the same pore size-controlled differentiation fate. We therefore attribute the differential cell and tissue fate to scaffold pore geometry. Scaffold pore size regulates mesenchymal cell fate, providing a novel design motif to control tissue regenerative processes and develop mesenchymal stem cell niches in vivo and in vitro through biophysical features.

Citing Articles

Selenium-modified hydroxyapatite titanium coating: enhancing osteogenesis and inhibiting cancer in bone invasion by head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Wen X, Zhou Q, Lin S, Mai H, Zhang L Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025; 13:1552661.

PMID: 40066360 PMC: 11891246. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1552661.


Strategies for promoting neurovascularization in bone regeneration.

Li X, Zhao Y, Miao L, An Y, Wu F, Han J Mil Med Res. 2025; 12(1):9.

PMID: 40025573 PMC: 11874146. DOI: 10.1186/s40779-025-00596-1.


Three-Dimensional Printed Biomimetic Elastomeric Scaffolds: Experimental Study of Surface Roughness and Pore Generation.

Marazzi D, Trovalusci F, Nardo P, Carotenuto F Biomimetics (Basel). 2025; 10(2).

PMID: 39997118 PMC: 11852423. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics10020095.


Engineering multifunctional surface topography to regulate multiple biological responses.

Asadi Tokmedash M, Kim C, Chavda A, Li A, Robins J, Min J Biomaterials. 2025; 319:123136.

PMID: 39978049 PMC: 11893264. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2025.123136.


Potential of Trilayered Gelatin/Polycaprolactone Nanofibers for Periodontal Regeneration: An In Vitro Study.

Tian Z, Zhao Z, Rausch M, Behm C, Tur D, Shokoohi-Tabrizi H Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(2).

PMID: 39859386 PMC: 11766300. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26020672.


References
1.
Saulnier N, Lattanzi W, Puglisi M, Pani G, Barba M, Piscaglia A . Mesenchymal stromal cells multipotency and plasticity: induction toward the hepatic lineage. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2009; 13 Suppl 1:71-8. View

2.
Ambrosi T, Longaker M, Chan C . A Revised Perspective of Skeletal Stem Cell Biology. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019; 7:189. PMC: 6753172. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00189. View

3.
Yen E, Yue C, Suga D . The effect of sutural growth rate on collagen phenotype synthesis. J Dent Res. 1989; 68(6):1058-63. DOI: 10.1177/00220345890680060101. View

4.
Peng J, Lai Z, Fang Z, Xing S, Hui K, Hao C . Dimethyloxalylglycine prevents bone loss in ovariectomized C57BL/6J mice through enhanced angiogenesis and osteogenesis. PLoS One. 2014; 9(11):e112744. PMC: 4231053. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112744. View

5.
Minoux M, Rijli F . Molecular mechanisms of cranial neural crest cell migration and patterning in craniofacial development. Development. 2010; 137(16):2605-21. DOI: 10.1242/dev.040048. View