» Articles » PMID: 33794832

The Pilot, Proof of Concept REMOTE-COVID Trial: Remote Monitoring Use in Suspected Cases of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV 2)

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2021 Apr 2
PMID 33794832
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: SARS-CoV-2 has ever-increasing attributed deaths. Vital sign trends are routinely used to monitor patients with changes in these parameters preceding an adverse event. Wearable sensors can measure vital signs continuously and remotely, outside of hospital facilities, recognising early clinical deterioration. We aim to determine the feasibility & acceptability of remote monitoring systems for quarantined individuals in a hotel suspected of COVID-19.

Methods: A pilot, proof-of-concept, feasibility trial was conducted in engineered hotels near London airports (May-June 2020). Individuals arriving to London with mild suspected COVID-19 symptoms requiring quarantine, as recommended by Public Health England, or healthcare professionals with COVID-19 symptoms unable to isolate at home were eligible. The SensiumVitals™ patch, measuring temperature, heart & respiratory rates, was applied on arrival for the duration of their stay. Alerts were generated when pre-established thresholds were breeched; trained nursing staff could consequently intervene.

Results: Fourteen individuals (M = 7, F = 7) were recruited; the mean age was 34.9 (SD 11) years. Mean length of stay was 3 (SD 1.8) days. In total, 10 vital alerts were generated across 4 participants, resulting in telephone contact, reassurance, or adjustment of the sensor. No individuals required hospitalisation or virtual general practitioner review.

Discussion: This proof-of-concept trial demonstrated the feasibility of a rapidly implemented model of healthcare delivery through remote monitoring during a pandemic at a hotel, acting as an extension to a healthcare trust. Benefits included reduced viral exposure to healthcare staff, with recognition of clinical deterioration through ambulatory, continuous, remote monitoring using a discrete wearable sensor.

Conclusion: Remote monitoring systems can be applied to hotels to deliver healthcare safely in individuals suspected of COVID-19. Further work is required to evaluate this model on a larger scale.

Trial Registration: Clinical trials registration information: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04337489 (07/04/2020).

Citing Articles

Remote Patient Monitoring at Home in Patients With COVID-19: Narrative Review.

Cornelis J, Christiaens W, de Meester C, Mistiaen P JMIR Nurs. 2024; 7:e44580.

PMID: 39287362 PMC: 11615560. DOI: 10.2196/44580.


Remote surveillance and detection of SARS-CoV-2 transmission among household members in King County, Washington.

Emanuels A, Casto A, Heimonen J, OHanlon J, Chow E, Ogokeh C BMC Infect Dis. 2024; 24(1):309.

PMID: 38481147 PMC: 10936024. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-024-09160-z.


Cardiac Remote Monitoring Devices and Technologies: A Review for the Perioperative Physician and Telemedicine Providers.

Kotha R, Streitmatter C, Serdiuk A, Aldawoodi N, Ackerman R Cureus. 2024; 16(2):e53914.

PMID: 38343706 PMC: 10855008. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53914.


Continuous Remote Monitoring in Moderate and Severe COVID-19 Patients.

Rajanna A, Bellary V, Puranic S, C N, Nagaraj J, A E Cureus. 2023; 15(9):e44528.

PMID: 37790039 PMC: 10544857. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44528.


Outcomes of Vital Sign Monitoring of an Acute Surgical Cohort With Wearable Sensors and Digital Alerting Systems: A Pragmatically Designed Cohort Study and Propensity-Matched Analysis.

Iqbal F, Joshi M, Fox R, Koutsoukou T, Sharma A, Wright M Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10:895973.

PMID: 35832414 PMC: 9271673. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.895973.


References
1.
Kenzaka T, Okayama M, Kuroki S, Fukui M, Yahata S, Hayashi H . Importance of vital signs to the early diagnosis and severity of sepsis: association between vital signs and sequential organ failure assessment score in patients with sepsis. Intern Med. 2012; 51(8):871-6. DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.51.6951. View

2.
Martirosyan M, Caliskan K, Theuns D, Szili-Torok T . Remote monitoring of heart failure: benefits for therapeutic decision making. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2017; 15(7):503-515. DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2017.1348229. View

3.
Downey C, Randell R, Brown J, Jayne D . Continuous Versus Intermittent Vital Signs Monitoring Using a Wearable, Wireless Patch in Patients Admitted to Surgical Wards: Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2018; 20(12):e10802. PMC: 6305881. DOI: 10.2196/10802. View

4.
Weenk M, Bredie S, Koeneman M, Hesselink G, Goor H, van de Belt T . Continuous Monitoring of Vital Signs in the General Ward Using Wearable Devices: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(6):e15471. PMC: 7315364. DOI: 10.2196/15471. View

5.
Criscuoli de Farias F, Dagostini C, de Assuncao Bicca Y, Falavigna V, Falavigna A . Remote Patient Monitoring: A Systematic Review. Telemed J E Health. 2019; 26(5):576-583. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0066. View