» Articles » PMID: 33794053

Assortative Mating Can Help Adaptation of Flowering Time to a Changing Climate: Insights from a Polygenic Model

Overview
Journal J Evol Biol
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Apr 1
PMID 33794053
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Several empirical studies report fast evolutionary changes in flowering time in response to contemporary climate change. Flowering time is a polygenic trait under assortative mating, since flowering time of mates must overlap. Here, we test whether assortative mating, compared with random mating, can help better track a changing climate. For each mating pattern, our individual-based model simulates a population evolving in a climate characterized by stabilizing selection around an optimal flowering time, which can change directionally and/or fluctuate. We also derive new analytical predictions from a quantitative genetics model for the expected genetic variance at equilibrium, and its components, the lag of the population to the optimum and the population mean fitness. We compare these predictions between assortative and random mating, and to our simulation results. Assortative mating, compared with random mating, has antagonistic effects on genetic variance: it generates positive associations among similar allelic effects, which inflates the genetic variance, but it decreases genetic polymorphism, which depresses the genetic variance. In a stationary environment with substantial stabilizing selection, assortative mating affects little the genetic variance compared with random mating. In a changing climate, assortative mating however increases genetic variance compared to random mating, which diminishes the lag of the population to the optimum, and in most scenarios translates into a fitness advantage relative to random mating. The magnitude of this fitness advantage depends on the extent to which genetic variance limits adaptation, being larger for faster environmental changes and weaker stabilizing selection.

Citing Articles

Evolutionary rescue from climate change: male indirect genetic effects on lay-dates and their consequences for population persistence.

Murray M, Wright J, Araya-Ajoy Y Evol Lett. 2024; 8(1):137-148.

PMID: 38487362 PMC: 10939382. DOI: 10.1093/evlett/qrad022.


Antagonistic Effects of Assortative Mating on the Evolution of Phenotypic Plasticity along Environmental Gradients.

Soularue J, Firmat C, Caignard T, Thoni A, Arnoux L, Delzon S Am Nat. 2023; 202(1):18-39.

PMID: 37384769 PMC: 7614710. DOI: 10.1086/724579.


Rapid evolution during climate change: demographic and genetic constraints on adaptation to severe drought.

Benning J, Faulkner A, Moeller D Proc Biol Sci. 2023; 290(1998):20230336.

PMID: 37161337 PMC: 10170215. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.0336.


Assortative mating for reproductive timing affects population recruitment and resilience in a quantitative genetic model.

May S, Hard J, Ford M, Naish K, Ward E Evol Appl. 2023; 16(3):657-672.

PMID: 36969143 PMC: 10033844. DOI: 10.1111/eva.13524.


Importance of interindividual interactions in eco-evolutionary population dynamics: The rise of demo-genetic agent-based models.

Lamarins A, Fririon V, Folio D, Vernier C, Daupagne L, Labonne J Evol Appl. 2022; 15(12):1988-2001.

PMID: 36540635 PMC: 9753837. DOI: 10.1111/eva.13508.


References
1.
Crow J, Felsenstein J . The effect of assortative mating on the genetic composition of a population. Eugen Q. 1968; 15(2):85-97. DOI: 10.1080/19485565.1968.9987760. View

2.
Kirkpatrick M, Selander R . GENETICS OF SPECIATION IN LAKE WHITEFISHES IN THE ALLEGASH BASIN. Evolution. 2017; 33(1Part2):478-485. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1979.tb04700.x. View

3.
Anderson J, Inouye D, McKinney A, Colautti R, Mitchell-Olds T . Phenotypic plasticity and adaptive evolution contribute to advancing flowering phenology in response to climate change. Proc Biol Sci. 2012; 279(1743):3843-52. PMC: 3415914. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1051. View

4.
Wright S . Systems of Mating. III. Assortative Mating Based on Somatic Resemblance. Genetics. 1921; 6(2):144-61. PMC: 1200503. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/6.2.144. View

5.
Wilson S, Kyle W, Bell A . The effects of mating systems and selection on pupa weight in Tribolium. Genet Res. 1965; 6(3):341-51. DOI: 10.1017/s0016672300004237. View