» Articles » PMID: 33791322

Phase Angle Cut-Off Points and Their Association With Sarcopenia and Frailty in Adults of 50-64 Years Old and Older Adults in Mexico City

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Apr 1
PMID 33791322
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In recent studies, the usefulness of the phase angle (PA) to assess geriatric conditions such as sarcopenia and frailty has been evaluated. However, there are no useful cut-off points for clinical research and/or practice. To analyze PA cut-off points associated with sarcopenia and frailty in adults of 50-64 years old and older adults in Mexico City. Cross-sectional analysis of the FraDySMex cohort study (Frailty, Dynapenia, and Sarcopenia in Mexican Adults). 498 people were included, 78.7% women, aged 71.1 ± 9.5 years. Methods: The sarcopenia measurements were made according to the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) (2019) (by dynamometer to evaluate hand grip strength and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for appendicular muscle mass), and the frailty through the physical frailty phenotype with cut-off points adjusted to the Mexican population. The PA was evaluated by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), tetrapolar to 50 Hz, other variables such as socio-demographic, comorbidity, cognitive status, and functional dependence were evaluated. The prevalence of frailty was 10.6% and sarcopenia 10.0%. The mean of the PA was 4.6° ± 0.70°. The PA cut-off point for frailty in adults 50 to 64 years was ≤4.3° [sensitivity (S) = 91.95%, specificity (Sp) 66.77%, AUROC (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve = 0.9273 95% CI (0.8720-0.9825)]; the PA cut-off point for sarcopenia was ≤4.3 [S = 91.95%, Sp = 66.77%, AUROC = 0.9306 95% CI (0.8508-1.000)]. The PA cut-off for frailty in adults ≥ 65 years was ≤4.1° [S = 72.37%, Sp 71.43%, AUROC = 0.7925 95%, CI (0.7280-0.8568)] for sarcopenia was ≤4.1° [S = 72.76%, Sp 73.81%, AUROC = 0.7930 95% CI (0.7272-0.8587)]. These cut-off points showed a significant association between PA with frailty (OR 4.84; 95% CI 2.61-8.99) and sarcopenia (OR 8.44; 95% CI 3.85-18.4) after adjusted by age, sex, BMI, comorbidity index and cognitive impairment. These cut-off points of PA could be useful for the screening of sarcopenia and frailty in Mexican adults of 50 years and older in centers that have BIA.

Citing Articles

Association between phase angle and level of independence in daily living among institutionalized super older females requiring nursing care.

Takayama A, Ishizaka M, Kubo A, Sato M, Yakabi A, Tsukahara S J Phys Ther Sci. 2024; 36(9):526-529.

PMID: 39239419 PMC: 11374166. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.36.526.


Phase Angle and Impedance Ratio as Indicators of Physical Function and Fear of Falling in Older Adult Women: Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Sterner D, Stout J, Lafontant K, Park J, Fukuda D, Thiamwong L JMIR Aging. 2024; 7:e53975.

PMID: 38488531 PMC: 10986333. DOI: 10.2196/53975.


Development and validation of a Sarcopenia Geriatric Scale (SARCO-GS): a new short scale for the screening of sarcopenia.

Rosas-Carrasco O, Omana-Guzman I, Garcia-Gonzalez A, Luna-Lopez A Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1192236.

PMID: 37635955 PMC: 10450023. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1192236.


Association between Phase Angle and Subjective Perceptions of Health Variables in Cancer Patients.

Gutierrez-Santamaria B, Martinez Aguirre-Betolaza A, Garcia-Alvarez A, Arietaleanizbeaskoa M, Mendizabal-Gallastegui N, Grandes G Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(13).

PMID: 37444686 PMC: 10341138. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11131852.


Association of Bioelectrical Impedance Phase Angle with Physical Performance and Nutrient Intake of Older Adults.

Unterberger S, Aschauer R, Zohrer P, Draxler A, Aschauer M, Kager B Nutrients. 2023; 15(6).

PMID: 36986185 PMC: 10057147. DOI: 10.3390/nu15061458.


References
1.
Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P . "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12(3):189-98. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. View

2.
Lawton M, Brody E . Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969; 9(3):179-86. View

3.
Cruz-Jentoft A, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyere O, Cederholm T . Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2018; 48(1):16-31. PMC: 6322506. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afy169. View

4.
Baumgartner R, Koehler K, Gallagher D, Romero L, Heymsfield S, Ross R . Epidemiology of sarcopenia among the elderly in New Mexico. Am J Epidemiol. 1998; 147(8):755-63. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009520. View

5.
Sanchez-Rodriguez D, Marco E, Miralles R, Fayos M, Mojal S, Alvarado M . Sarcopenia, physical rehabilitation and functional outcomes of patients in a subacute geriatric care unit. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2014; 59(1):39-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2014.02.009. View