» Articles » PMID: 33780449

Tuned Inhibition in Perceptual Decision-making Circuits Can Explain Seemingly Suboptimal Confidence Behavior

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Mar 29
PMID 33780449
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Current dominant views hold that perceptual confidence reflects the probability that a decision is correct. Although these views have enjoyed some empirical support, recent behavioral results indicate that confidence and the probability of being correct can be dissociated. An alternative hypothesis suggests that confidence instead reflects the magnitude of evidence in favor of a decision while being relatively insensitive to the evidence opposing the decision. We considered how this alternative hypothesis might be biologically instantiated by developing a simple neural network model incorporating a known property of sensory neurons: tuned inhibition. The key idea of the model is that the level of inhibition that each accumulator unit receives from units with the opposite tuning preference, i.e. its inhibition 'tuning', dictates its contribution to perceptual decisions versus confidence judgments, such that units with higher tuned inhibition (computing relative evidence for different perceptual interpretations) determine perceptual discrimination decisions, and units with lower tuned inhibition (computing absolute evidence) determine confidence. We demonstrate that this biologically plausible model can account for several counterintuitive findings reported in the literature where confidence and decision accuracy dissociate. By comparing model fits, we further demonstrate that a full complement of behavioral data across several previously published experimental results-including accuracy, reaction time, mean confidence, and metacognitive sensitivity-is best accounted for when confidence is computed from units without, rather than units with, tuned inhibition. Finally, we discuss predictions of our results and model for future neurobiological studies. These findings suggest that the brain has developed and implements this alternative, heuristic theory of perceptual confidence computation by relying on the diversity of neural resources available.

Citing Articles

A novel behavioral paradigm reveals the nature of confidence computation in multi-alternative perceptual decision making.

Xue K, Shekhar M, Rahnev D Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 39711537 PMC: 11661388. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5510856/v1.


Human-like dissociations between confidence and accuracy in convolutional neural networks.

Shekhar M, Rahnev D PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(11):e1012578.

PMID: 39541396 PMC: 11594416. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012578.


A Population Representation of the Confidence in a Decision in the Parietal Cortex.

Zylberberg A, Shadlen M bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39229195 PMC: 11370442. DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.15.608159.


Double Dissociation of Spontaneous Alpha-Band Activity and Pupil-Linked Arousal on Additive and Multiplicative Perceptual Gain.

Pilipenko A, Samaha J J Neurosci. 2024; 44(19).

PMID: 38548339 PMC: 11079969. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1944-23.2024.


How do humans give confidence? A comprehensive comparison of process models of perceptual metacognition.

Shekhar M, Rahnev D J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023; 153(3):656-688.

PMID: 38095983 PMC: 10922729. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001524.


References
1.
Ratcliff R, Rouder J . A diffusion model account of masking in two-choice letter identification. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000; 26(1):127-40. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.26.1.127. View

2.
Rahnev D, Bahdo L, de Lange F, Lau H . Prestimulus hemodynamic activity in dorsal attention network is negatively associated with decision confidence in visual perception. J Neurophysiol. 2012; 108(5):1529-36. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00184.2012. View

3.
Samaha J, Barrett J, Sheldon A, LaRocque J, Postle B . Dissociating Perceptual Confidence from Discrimination Accuracy Reveals No Influence of Metacognitive Awareness on Working Memory. Front Psychol. 2016; 7:851. PMC: 4893488. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00851. View

4.
Janowsky J, Shimamura A, Kritchevsky M, Squire L . Cognitive impairment following frontal lobe damage and its relevance to human amnesia. Behav Neurosci. 1989; 103(3):548-60. DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.103.3.548. View

5.
Sanders J, Hangya B, Kepecs A . Signatures of a Statistical Computation in the Human Sense of Confidence. Neuron. 2016; 90(3):499-506. PMC: 5350614. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.03.025. View