» Articles » PMID: 33737456

Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation Acutely Lowers the Response Threshold of Human Motor Circuits

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2021 Mar 19
PMID 33737456
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) over cortical areas has been shown to acutely improve performance in sensory detection tasks. One explanation for this behavioral effect is stochastic resonance (SR), a mechanism that explains how signal processing in nonlinear systems can benefit from added noise. While acute noise benefits of electrical RNS have been demonstrated at the behavioral level as well as in preparations of neural tissue, it is currently largely unknown whether similar effects can be shown at the neural population level using neurophysiological readouts of human cortex. Here, we hypothesized that acute tRNS will increase the responsiveness of primary motor cortex (M1) when probed with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Neural responsiveness was operationalized via the well-known concept of the resting motor threshold (RMT). We showed that tRNS acutely decreases RMT. This effect was small, but it was consistently replicated across four experiments including different cohorts (total = 81, 46 females, 35 males), two tRNS electrode montages, and different control conditions. Our experiments provide critical neurophysiological evidence that tRNS can acutely generate noise benefits by enhancing the neural population response of human M1. A hallmark feature of stochastic resonance (SR) is that signal processing can benefit from added noise. This has mainly been demonstrated at the single-cell level where the neural response to weak input signals can be enhanced by simultaneously applying random noise. Our finding that transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) acutely increases the excitability of corticomotor circuits extends the principle of noise benefits to the neural population level in human cortex. Our finding is in line with the notion that tRNS might affect cortical processing via the SR phenomenon. It suggests that enhancing the response of cortical populations to an external stimulus might be one neurophysiological mechanism mediating performance improvements when tRNS is applied to sensory cortex during perception tasks.

Citing Articles

The effect of transcranial random noise stimulation on the movement time and components of noise, co-variation, and tolerance in a perceptual-motor task.

Salehi F, Doustan M, Saemi E Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4083.

PMID: 39901001 PMC: 11790889. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88396-4.


Differing effectiveness of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation for enhancing working memory in healthy individuals: a randomized controlled trial.

Tokikuni Y, Watanabe A, Nakazono H, Miura H, Saito R, Miaowen D J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024; 21(1):180.

PMID: 39402554 PMC: 11472542. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01481-z.


Reduction of cognitive fatigue and improved performance at a VR-based driving simulator using tRNS.

Benelli A, Memoli C, Neri F, Romanella S, Cinti A, Giannotta A iScience. 2024; 27(9):110536.

PMID: 39314236 PMC: 11418143. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110536.


Changes in vestibular-related responses to combined noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation and cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation.

Mitsutake T, Nakazono H, Shiozaki T, Fujita D, Sakamoto M Exp Brain Res. 2023; 242(1):99-108.

PMID: 37966504 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-023-06731-5.


Contrast detection is enhanced by deterministic, high-frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation with triangle and sine waveform.

Potok W, van der Groen O, Sivachelvam S, Bachinger M, Frohlich F, Kish L J Neurophysiol. 2023; 130(2):458-473.

PMID: 37465880 PMC: 10625838. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00465.2022.


References
1.
Devanne H, Lavoie B, Capaday C . Input-output properties and gain changes in the human corticospinal pathway. Exp Brain Res. 1997; 114(2):329-38. DOI: 10.1007/pl00005641. View

2.
Vieira P, Krause M, Pack C . tACS entrains neural activity while somatosensory input is blocked. PLoS Biol. 2020; 18(10):e3000834. PMC: 7553316. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000834. View

3.
Mills K, Boniface S, Schubert M . Magnetic brain stimulation with a double coil: the importance of coil orientation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992; 85(1):17-21. DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(92)90096-t. View

4.
Jonker Z, Gaiser C, Tulen J, Ribbers G, Frens M, Selles R . No effect of anodal tDCS on motor cortical excitability and no evidence for responders in a large double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Brain Stimul. 2020; 14(1):100-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.11.005. View

5.
Deans J, Powell A, Jefferys J . Sensitivity of coherent oscillations in rat hippocampus to AC electric fields. J Physiol. 2007; 583(Pt 2):555-65. PMC: 2277040. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.137711. View