» Articles » PMID: 33731094

One Healthy Live Birth After Preimplantation Genetic Testing of a Cryptic Balanced Translocation (9;13) in a Family with Cerebral Palsy and Glaucoma: a Case Report

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Genetics
Date 2021 Mar 18
PMID 33731094
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cryptic balanced translocations often evade detection by conventional cytogenetics. The preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) technique can be used to help carriers of balanced translocations give birth to healthy offspring; however, for carriers of cryptic balanced translocations, there is only one report about trying assisted reproduction using the PGT technique but with no pregnancy.

Case Presentation: A couple had 3 births out of 4 pregnancies, and all died very young, with two of them having both cerebral palsy and glaucoma. The husband with oligoasthenospermia was found to be a cryptic balanced translocation carrier for t (9,13) (p24.3, q31.3) with G-banding, FISH (fluorescence in-situ hybridization), and MicroSeq techniques; live birth of a healthy baby girl was achieved with PGT/NGS (next-generation sequencing) for the couple.

Conclusion: Here, we report for the first time a successful live birth of a healthy baby through the PGT technique for a family in which the husband is a carrier of the cryptic balanced translocation t (9,13) (p24.3, q31.3), presumably causative for cerebral palsy and glaucoma. Our study showed that the PGT/NGS technique can effectively help families with a cryptic balanced translocation have healthy offspring.

Citing Articles

Identification and interruption of inheritance of familial cryptic translocations: A case report.

Ou J, Sun J, Yang C, Ni M, Zou Q, Xing S Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2024; 12(1):e2356.

PMID: 38284442 PMC: 10795077. DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.2356.


An Incidental Detection of a Cryptic Complex Chromosome Rearrangement Found During NGS Based PGT-SR: A Case Report.

Ozer L, Aktuna S, Unsal E, Baltaci A, Baltaci V J Reprod Infertil. 2022; 23(4):303-309.

PMID: 36452189 PMC: 9674458. DOI: 10.18502/jri.v23i4.10817.

References
1.
Cui C, Shu W, Li P . Fluorescence In situ Hybridization: Cell-Based Genetic Diagnostic and Research Applications. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2016; 4:89. PMC: 5011256. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2016.00089. View

2.
Huang C, Jiang W, Zhu Y, Li H, Lu J, Yan J . Pregnancy outcomes of reciprocal translocation carriers with two or more unfavorable pregnancy histories: before and after preimplantation genetic testing. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019; 36(11):2325-2331. PMC: 6885462. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01585-9. View

3.
Di Gregorio E, Savin E, Biamino E, Belligni E, Naretto V, DAlessandro G . Large cryptic genomic rearrangements with apparently normal karyotypes detected by array-CGH. Mol Cytogenet. 2014; 7(1):82. PMC: 4247713. DOI: 10.1186/s13039-014-0082-7. View

4.
Escudero T, Abdelhadi I, Sandalinas M, Munne S . Predictive value of sperm fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis on the outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for translocations. Fertil Steril. 2003; 79 Suppl 3:1528-34. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00252-8. View

5.
Cai Y, Ding M, Lin F, Diao Z, Zhang N, Sun H . Evaluation of preimplantation genetic testing based on next-generation sequencing for balanced reciprocal translocation carriers. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019; 38(5):669-675. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.12.043. View