» Articles » PMID: 33716831

Electroencephalographic Microstates in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2021 Mar 15
PMID 33716831
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Schizophrenia (SCH) and bipolar disorder (BD) are characterized by many types of symptoms, damaged cognitive function, and abnormal brain connections. The microstates are considered to be the cornerstones of the mental states shown in EEG data. In our study, we investigated the use of microstates as biomarkers to distinguish patients with bipolar disorder from those with schizophrenia by analyzing EEG data measured in an eyes-closed resting state. The purpose of this article is to provide an electron directional physiological explanation for the observed brain dysfunction of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder patients. We used microstate resting EEG data to explore group differences in the duration, coverage, occurrence, and transition probability of 4 microstate maps among 20 SCH patients, 26 BD patients, and 35 healthy controls (HCs). Microstate analysis revealed 4 microstates (A-D) in global clustering across SCH patients, BD patients, and HCs. The samples were chosen to be matched. We found the greater presence of microstate B in BD patients, and the less presence of microstate class A and B, the greater presence of microstate class C, and less presence of D in SCH patients. Besides, a greater frequent switching between microstates A and B and between microstates B and A in BD patients than in SCH patients and HCs and less frequent switching between microstates C and D and between microstates D and C in BD patients compared with SCH patients. We found abnormal features of microstate A, B in BD patients and abnormal features of microstate A, B, C, and D in SCH patients. These features may indicate the potential abnormalities of SCH patients and BD patients in distributing neural resources and influencing opportune transitions between different states of activity.

Citing Articles

A Machine-Learning-Based Analysis of Resting State Electroencephalogram Signals to Identify Latent Schizotypal and Bipolar Development in Healthy University Students.

Gubics F, Nagy A, Dombi J, Palfi A, Szabo Z, Viharos Z Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(4).

PMID: 40002604 PMC: 11854578. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15040454.


Intrinsic brain activity differences in drug-resistant epilepsy and well-controlled epilepsy patients: an EEG microstate analysis.

Zhu C, Zhang J, Fang S, Zhang Y, Li J, Wu L Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2024; 17:17562864241307846.

PMID: 39735404 PMC: 11672497. DOI: 10.1177/17562864241307846.


Abnormal nonlinear features of EEG microstate sequence in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Ren H, Ran X, Qiu M, Lv S, Wang J, Wang C BMC Psychiatry. 2024; 24(1):881.

PMID: 39627734 PMC: 11616381. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-06334-6.


EEG analysis in patients with schizophrenia based on microstate semantic modeling method.

Li H, Wang C, Ma L, Xu C, Li H Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1372985.

PMID: 38638803 PMC: 11024310. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1372985.


EEG spectral and microstate analysis originating residual inhibition of tinnitus induced by tailor-made notched music training.

Zhu M, Gong Q Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1254423.

PMID: 38148944 PMC: 10750374. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1254423.


References
1.
Yin Z, Chang M, Wei S, Jiang X, Zhou Y, Cui L . Decreased Functional Connectivity in Insular Subregions in Depressive Episodes of Bipolar Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder. Front Neurosci. 2018; 12:842. PMC: 6246657. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00842. View

2.
Ramos da Cruz J, Favrod O, Roinishvili M, Chkonia E, Brand A, Mohr C . EEG microstates are a candidate endophenotype for schizophrenia. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):3089. PMC: 7303216. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16914-1. View

3.
Hill K, Mann L, Laws K, Stephenson C, Nimmo-Smith I, McKenna P . Hypofrontality in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of functional imaging studies. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2004; 110(4):243-56. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00376.x. View

4.
Fox M, Snyder A, Vincent J, Corbetta M, Van Essen D, Raichle M . The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(27):9673-8. PMC: 1157105. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0504136102. View

5.
Milz P, Faber P, Lehmann D, Koenig T, Kochi K, Pascual-Marqui R . The functional significance of EEG microstates--Associations with modalities of thinking. Neuroimage. 2015; 125:643-656. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.023. View