» Articles » PMID: 33665213

A Review of Recent Advances in 3D Bioprinting With an Eye on Future Regenerative Therapies in Veterinary Medicine

Overview
Journal Front Vet Sci
Date 2021 Mar 5
PMID 33665213
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

3D bioprinting is a rapidly evolving industry that has been utilized for a variety of biomedical applications. It differs from traditional 3D printing in that it utilizes bioinks comprised of cells and other biomaterials to allow for the generation of complex functional tissues. Bioprinting involves computational modeling, bioink preparation, bioink deposition, and subsequent maturation of printed products; it is an intricate process where bioink composition, bioprinting approach, and bioprinter type must be considered during construct development. This technology has already found success in human studies, where a variety of functional tissues have been generated for both and applications. Although the main driving force behind innovation in 3D bioprinting has been utility in human medicine, recent efforts investigating its veterinary application have begun to emerge. To date, 3D bioprinting has been utilized to create bone, cardiovascular, cartilage, corneal and neural constructs in animal species. Furthermore, the use of animal-derived cells and various animal models in human research have provided additional information regarding its capacity for veterinary translation. While these studies have produced some promising results, technological limitations as well as ethical and regulatory challenges have impeded clinical acceptance. This article reviews the current understanding of 3D bioprinting technology and its recent advancements with a focus on recent successes and future translation in veterinary medicine.

Citing Articles

3D bioprinting technology innovation in female reproductive system.

Chen S, Wang T, Chen J, Sui M, Wang L, Zhao X Mater Today Bio. 2025; 31:101551.

PMID: 40026632 PMC: 11870202. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101551.


Application of Additive Manufacturing in Assisted Reproductive Techniques: What Is the Evidence? A Clinical and Technical Systematic Review of the Literature.

Kontogeorgi A, Boutas I, Tsangkalova G, Messaropoulos P, Koufopoulos N, Schwab R Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(11).

PMID: 39597074 PMC: 11596948. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60111889.


A 3D Bioprinting Approach to Studying Retinal Müller Cells.

Vecchiotti D, Di Vito Nolfi M, Veglianti F, DallAglio F, Khan H, Flati I Genes (Basel). 2024; 15(11).

PMID: 39596614 PMC: 11593586. DOI: 10.3390/genes15111414.


Innovative Bioscaffolds in Stem Cell and Regenerative Therapies for Corneal Pathologies.

Visalli F, Fava F, Capobianco M, Musa M, DEsposito F, Russo A Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(9).

PMID: 39329601 PMC: 11428434. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11090859.


Advancing cardiac regeneration through 3D bioprinting: methods, applications, and future directions.

Zheng Z, Tang W, Li Y, Ai Y, Tu Z, Yang J Heart Fail Rev. 2023; 29(3):599-613.

PMID: 37943420 DOI: 10.1007/s10741-023-10367-6.


References
1.
Mitsuzawa S, Ikeguchi R, Aoyama T, Takeuchi H, Yurie H, Oda H . The Efficacy of a Scaffold-free Bio 3D Conduit Developed from Autologous Dermal Fibroblasts on Peripheral Nerve Regeneration in a Canine Ulnar Nerve Injury Model: A Preclinical Proof-of-Concept Study. Cell Transplant. 2019; 28(9-10):1231-1241. PMC: 6767885. DOI: 10.1177/0963689719855346. View

2.
Ozbolat I, Hospodiuk M . Current advances and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting. Biomaterials. 2015; 76:321-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.076. View

3.
Di Bella C, Duchi S, OConnell C, Blanchard R, Augustine C, Yue Z . In situ handheld three-dimensional bioprinting for cartilage regeneration. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017; 12(3):611-621. DOI: 10.1002/term.2476. View

4.
Zhang T, Zhang H, Zhang L, Jia S, Liu J, Xiong Z . Biomimetic design and fabrication of multilayered osteochondral scaffolds by low-temperature deposition manufacturing and thermal-induced phase-separation techniques. Biofabrication. 2017; 9(2):025021. DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa7078. View

5.
Roberts C, Chen S, Murchison A, Ogle R, Francis M, Ogle R . Preferential Lineage-Specific Differentiation of Osteoblast-Derived Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells into Osteoprogenitors. Stem Cells Int. 2017; 2017:1513281. PMC: 5303871. DOI: 10.1155/2017/1513281. View