» Articles » PMID: 33651099

End-of-treatment PET/CT Predicts PFS and OS in DLBCL After First-line Treatment: Results from GOYA

Abstract

GOYA was a randomized phase 3 study comparing obinutuzumab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) vs standard-of-care rituximab plus CHOP in patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This retrospective analysis of GOYA aimed to assess the association between progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with positron emission tomography (PET)-based complete response (CR) status. Overall, 1418 patients were randomly assigned to receive 8 21-day cycles of obinutuzumab (n = 706) or rituximab (n = 712) plus 6 or 8 cycles of CHOP. Patients received a mandatory fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose-PET/computed tomography scan at baseline and end of treatment. After a median follow-up of 29 months, the numbers of independent review committee-assessed PFS and OS events in the entire cohort were 416 (29.3%) and 252 (17.8%), respectively. End-of-treatment PET CR was highly prognostic for PFS and OS according to Lugano 2014 criteria (PFS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.38; P < .0001; OS: HR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.08-0.17; P < .0001), irrespective of international prognostic index score and cell of origin. In conclusion, the results from this prospectively acquired large cohort corroborated previously published data from smaller sample sizes showing that end-of-treatment PET CR is an independent predictor of PFS and OS and a promising prognostic marker in DLBCL. Long-term survival analysis confirmed the robustness of these data over time. Additional meta-analyses including other prospective studies are necessary to support the substitution of PET CR for PFS as an effective and practical surrogate end point. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01287741.

Citing Articles

Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging provides accurate staging of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, but is less preferred by patients.

Lambert L, Wagnerova M, Vodicka P, Benesova K, Zogala D, Trneny M World J Radiol. 2025; 17(1):99207.

PMID: 39876887 PMC: 11755907. DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i1.99207.


Clinical scoring systems, molecular subtypes and baseline [F]FDG PET/CT image analysis for prognosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Sun Z, Yang T, Ding C, Shi Y, Cheng L, Jia Q Cancer Imaging. 2024; 24(1):168.

PMID: 39696503 PMC: 11656546. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-024-00810-8.


Using Deauville Scoring to Guide Consolidative Radiotherapy in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Yau C, Low C, Ong W, Khoo L, Hoe J, Tan Y Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(19).

PMID: 39409931 PMC: 11475697. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16193311.


Prospects for liquid biopsy approaches in lymphomas.

Jamal E, Poynton E, Elbogdady M, Shamaa S, Okosun J Leuk Lymphoma. 2024; 65(13):1923-1933.

PMID: 39126310 PMC: 11627208. DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2024.2389210.


Automated Lugano Metabolic Response Assessment in F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-Avid Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma With Deep Learning on F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography.

Jemaa S, Ounadjela S, Wang X, El-Galaly T, Kostakoglu L, Knapp A J Clin Oncol. 2024; 42(25):2966-2977.

PMID: 38843483 PMC: 11361360. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.23.01978.


References
1.
Zhou Z, Sehn L, Rademaker A, Gordon L, LaCasce A, Crosby-Thompson A . An enhanced International Prognostic Index (NCCN-IPI) for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated in the rituximab era. Blood. 2013; 123(6):837-42. PMC: 5527396. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2013-09-524108. View

2.
Mamot C, Klingbiel D, Hitz F, Renner C, Pabst T, Driessen C . Final Results of a Prospective Evaluation of the Predictive Value of Interim Positron Emission Tomography in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated With R-CHOP-14 (SAKK 38/07). J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33(23):2523-9. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.9846. View

3.
Cashen A, Dehdashti F, Luo J, Homb A, Siegel B, Bartlett N . 18F-FDG PET/CT for early response assessment in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: poor predictive value of international harmonization project interpretation. J Nucl Med. 2011; 52(3):386-92. PMC: 4019941. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.110.082586. View

4.
Kanemasa Y, Shimoyama T, Sasaki Y, Tamura M, Sawada T, Omuro Y . Analysis of prognostic value of complete response by PET-CT and further stratification by clinical and biological markers in DLBCL patients. Med Oncol. 2017; 34(2):29. DOI: 10.1007/s12032-017-0885-6. View

5.
Bishton M, McMillan A, Fox C . Does end-of-treatment FDG-PET provide any additional prognostic value to the pre-treatment NCCN-IPI score? Reply to Adams and Kwee. Br J Haematol. 2016; 177(2):320-321. DOI: 10.1111/bjh.14050. View