» Articles » PMID: 33632330

Cluster Randomised Controlled Feasibility Study of HENRY: a Community-based Intervention Aimed at Reducing Obesity Rates in Preschool Children

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2021 Feb 26
PMID 33632330
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Community-based obesity prevention interventions are often commissioned despite the limited evidence base. HENRY (Health, Exercise, Nutrition for the Really Young) is a programme delivered to parents of preschool children across the UK. Early evidence suggests that it may be effective, but a robust evaluation has not been conducted. We initiated a systematic evaluation of HENRY by studying the feasibility of conducting a multi-centre definitive trial to evaluate its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness to prevent obesity. Objectives were to assess the feasibility of recruiting local authorities, centres and parents; test processes and time required to train and certify intervention staff; explore HENRY commissioning processes; identify potential sources (and associated impact) of contamination; and consider the feasibility of trial procedures.

Methods: We conducted a multi-centre, open labelled, two group, prospective, cluster randomised, controlled, feasibility study, with embedded process evaluation and pre-defined criteria for progression to definitive trial. We sought to recruit 120 parents from 12 children's centres, across two UK local authority (government) areas. Within each local authority, we planned to randomise three centres to HENRY and three to 'standard care' control. Our plan was to collect data in family homes at baseline and 12 months, including parent and child height and weight, and parent-reported questionnaires on self-efficacy, feeding, eating habits, quality of life and resource use. Contamination, implementation and study acceptability were explored using parent interviews.

Results: We recruited two local authorities and 12 children's centres within eight months. One hundred and seventeen parents were recruited (average 3.9 parents per programme) and follow-up data were collected from 85% of participants. Process data from 20 parents and 24 members of staff indicate that both would benefit from more detail about their involvement as participants, but that methods were acceptable. Contamination was likely, though the impact of this on behaviour was unclear.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that a cluster RCT of HENRY to assess its effect on childhood obesity prevention is feasible. This study has allowed us to design a pragmatic definitive trial with minimal bias, taking account of lessons learnt from conducting evaluation research in public health settings.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03333733 registered 6th November 2017.

Citing Articles

Assessing the impact of obesity interventions in the early years: a systematic review of UK-based studies.

Michalopoulou S, Sifaki M, Packer J, Lanigan J, Stansfield C, Viner R BMJ Open. 2024; 14(5):e076479.

PMID: 38740507 PMC: 11097867. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076479.


Healthy eating interventions delivered in early childhood education and care settings for improving the diet of children aged six months to six years.

Yoong S, Lum M, Wolfenden L, Jackson J, Barnes C, Hall A Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 8:CD013862.

PMID: 37606067 PMC: 10443896. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013862.pub3.


Healthy eating interventions delivered in early childhood education and care settings for improving the diet of children aged six months to six years.

Yoong S, Lum M, Wolfenden L, Jackson J, Barnes C, Hall A Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 6:CD013862.

PMID: 37306513 PMC: 10259732. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013862.pub2.


A cluster RCT and process evaluation of an implementation optimisation intervention to promote parental engagement enrolment and attendance in a childhood obesity prevention programme: results of the Optimising Family Engagement in HENRY (OFTEN)....

Bryant M, Burton W, Collinson M, Farrin A, Nixon J, Stevens J Trials. 2021; 22(1):773.

PMID: 34740373 PMC: 8569980. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05757-w.

References
1.
Hahn S, Puffer S, Torgerson D, Watson J . Methodological bias in cluster randomised trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005; 5:10. PMC: 554774. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-10. View

2.
Hertzog M . Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Res Nurs Health. 2008; 31(2):180-91. DOI: 10.1002/nur.20247. View

3.
Barber S, Jackson C, Hewitt C, Ainsworth H, Buckley H, Akhtar S . Assessing the feasibility of evaluating and delivering a physical activity intervention for pre-school children: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016; 2:12. PMC: 5154100. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-016-0052-4. View

4.
Willis T, George J, Hunt C, Roberts K, Evans C, Brown R . Combating child obesity: impact of HENRY on parenting and family lifestyle. Pediatr Obes. 2013; 9(5):339-50. DOI: 10.1111/j.2047-6310.2013.00183.x. View

5.
Burton W, Twiddy M, Sahota P, Brown J, Bryant M . Participant engagement with a UK community-based preschool childhood obesity prevention programme: a focused ethnography study. BMC Public Health. 2019; 19(1):1074. PMC: 6688247. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7410-0. View