» Articles » PMID: 33628058

Practices and Hindrances in Cancer Pain Management: Results of a National Multi-Cancer Center Survey Among Healthcare Professionals in China

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Feb 25
PMID 33628058
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Inadequate control of cancer-related pain in China is an ongoing problem. This study investigated the practices of cancer pain (CP) management at major cancer centers in China and perceived hindrances and knowledge of CP management among health professionals.

Methods: From September to October 2019, a survey was conducted using electronic questionnaires via the internet to investigate the practices, and perceived hindrances and knowledge in managing CP among healthcare professionals from 7 provincial cancer centers in China. The questionnaire included demographic data, the professionals' practices among their own patients, their opinions regarding hindrances to CP management, and knowledge of CP management.

Results: We gathered validated responses from 411 anonymous healthcare professionals, with 82.2% (411/500) of response rate. Based on the analysis of these 411 questionnaires, the results demonstrated that CP was prevalent among patients with cancer, while moderate-to-severe pain took a great proportion. CP management was inadequate for a significant proportion of the patients with CP. Pain assessment, analgesic treatment, attention to adverse effects of analgesic, and multidisciplinary management were usually ineffectual in many cases. The duration of work experience did not significantly affect CP management. The respondents considered that both patients and healthcare professionals were responsible for the undermanagement of CP. Only 26 (6.3%) respondents were able to answer correctly all 10 of the professional questions regarding CP.

Conclusion: CP is commonly undermanaged in China. Effective pain control requires the implementation of standards, and the sufficient attention and training of healthcare professionals.

Citing Articles

Pharmacists' knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers to cancer pain management: a cross-sectional survey in Chongqing, China.

Liu Y, Chen T, Li X, Song J, Zhang F BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):210.

PMID: 39910639 PMC: 11800434. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-12370-z.


Implementing Cancer Pain Management Training for Pharmacists Using the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model.

Liu Y, Peng Y, Zhu B, Xia Z, Yuan Y, Zhang F J Pain Res. 2025; 18:305-314.

PMID: 39867535 PMC: 11762252. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S493936.


A Survey of Knowledge and Barriers of Healthcare Professionals toward Opioid Analgesics in Cancer Pain Management.

Ayoub N, Jibreel M, Nuseir K, Al-Taani G Int J Clin Pract. 2022; 2022:1136430.

PMID: 35685510 PMC: 9159223. DOI: 10.1155/2022/1136430.

References
1.
van den Beuken-van Everdingen M, Hochstenbach L, Joosten E, Tjan-Heijnen V, Janssen D . Update on Prevalence of Pain in Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016; 51(6):1070-1090.e9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.340. View

2.
Garcia-Mata J, Alamo C, de Castro J, Contreras J, Galvez R, Jara C . A survey of perceptions, attitudes, knowledge and practices of medical oncologists about cancer pain management in Spain. Clin Transl Oncol. 2018; 20(8):1061-1071. DOI: 10.1007/s12094-017-1826-8. View

3.
Greco M, Roberto A, Corli O, Deandrea S, Bandieri E, Cavuto S . Quality of cancer pain management: an update of a systematic review of undertreatment of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32(36):4149-54. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.0383. View

4.
Ventafridda V, Tamburini M, Caraceni A, De Conno F, NALDI F . A validation study of the WHO method for cancer pain relief. Cancer. 1987; 59(4):850-6. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19870215)59:4<850::aid-cncr2820590432>3.0.co;2-1. View

5.
Gunnarsdottir S, Sigurdardottir V, Kloke M, Radbruch L, Sabatowski R, Kaasa S . A multicenter study of attitudinal barriers to cancer pain management. Support Care Cancer. 2017; 25(11):3595-3602. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-017-3791-8. View