» Articles » PMID: 26940689

Are Strong Opioids Equally Effective and Safe in the Treatment of Chronic Cancer Pain? A Multicenter Randomized Phase IV 'real Life' Trial on the Variability of Response to Opioids

Overview
Journal Ann Oncol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Oncology
Date 2016 Mar 5
PMID 26940689
Citations 46
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Guidelines tend to consider morphine and morphine-like opioids comparable and interchangeable in the treatment of chronic cancer pain, but individual responses can vary. This study compared the analgesic efficacy, changes of therapy and safety profile over time of four strong opioids given for cancer pain.

Patient And Methods: In this four-arm multicenter, randomized, comparative, of superiority, phase IV trial, oncological patients with moderate to severe pain requiring WHO step III opioids were randomly assigned to receive oral morphine or oxycodone or transdermal fentanyl or buprenorphine for 28 days. At each visit, pain intensity, modifications of therapy and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were recorded. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of nonresponders, meaning patients with worse or unchanged average pain intensity (API) between the first and last visit, measured on a 0-10 numerical rating scale. (NCT01809106).

Results: Forty-four centers participated in the trial and recruited 520 patients. Worst pain intensity and API decreased over 4 weeks with no significant differences between drugs. Nonresponders ranged from 11.5% (morphine) to 14.4% (buprenorphine). Appreciable changes were made in the treatment schedules over time. Each group required increases in the daily dose, from 32.7% (morphine) to 121.2% (transdermal fentanyl). Patients requiring adjuvant analgesics ranged from 68.9% (morphine) to 81.6% (oxycodone), switches varied from 22.1% (morphine) to 12% (oxycodone), discontinuation of treatment from 27% ( morphine) to 14.5% (fentanyl). ADRs were similar except for effects on the nervous system, which significantly prevailed with morphine.

Conclusion: The main findings were the similarity in pain control, response rates and main adverse reactions among opioids. Changes in therapy schedules were notable over time. A considerable proportion of patients were nonresponders or poor responders.

Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01809106 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01809106?term=cerp&rank=2).

Citing Articles

A genome-wide association study of European advanced cancer patients treated with opioids identifies regulatory variants on chromosome 20 associated with pain intensity.

Minnai F, Shkodra M, Noci S, Esposito M, Brunelli C, Pigni A Eur J Pain. 2024; 29(1):e4764.

PMID: 39629963 PMC: 11616469. DOI: 10.1002/ejp.4764.


Consensus statement on chronic pain treatment in cancer survivors.

Mamiya K, Iida H, Iseki M, Yamaguch S, Yonekura H, Ueno H J Anesth. 2024; .

PMID: 39627504 DOI: 10.1007/s00540-024-03427-0.


Impact of genetic variants on fentanyl metabolism in major breast surgery patients: a candidate gene association study.

Kumar S, Ramasamy K, Natarajan H, Venkatraman S, Eriyat V, Kundra P Pharmacogenomics. 2024; 25(14-15):595-603.

PMID: 39563600 PMC: 11703455. DOI: 10.1080/14622416.2024.2429365.


Safety and efficacy of oxycodone for refractory dyspnea in end-stage heart failure patients with chronic kidney disease: a case series of eight patients.

Tanaka M, Maeba H, Senoo T, Yoshimiya N, Ozaki H, Uchitani K J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2024; 10(1):63.

PMID: 39375816 PMC: 11457324. DOI: 10.1186/s40780-024-00384-4.


[Pain therapy in urology-overview of current S3 guideline recommendations].

Drager D, Protzel C Urologie. 2024; 63(5):462-468.

PMID: 38698261 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-024-02334-2.