» Articles » PMID: 33622418

Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Proteinopathies Have Disparate Microscopic Patterns of White and Grey Matter Pathology

Abstract

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration proteinopathies with tau inclusions (FTLD-Tau) or TDP-43 inclusions (FTLD-TDP) are associated with clinically similar phenotypes. However, these disparate proteinopathies likely differ in cellular severity and regional distribution of inclusions in white matter (WM) and adjacent grey matter (GM), which have been understudied. We performed a neuropathological study of subcortical WM and adjacent GM in a large autopsy cohort (n = 92; FTLD-Tau = 37, FTLD-TDP = 55) using a validated digital image approach. The antemortem clinical phenotype was behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) in 23 patients with FTLD-Tau and 42 with FTLD-TDP, and primary progressive aphasia (PPA) in 14 patients with FTLD-Tau and 13 with FTLD-TDP. We used linear mixed-effects models to: (1) compare WM pathology burden between proteinopathies; (2) investigate the relationship between WM pathology burden and WM degeneration using luxol fast blue (LFB) myelin staining; (3) study regional patterns of pathology burden in clinico-pathological groups. WM pathology burden was greater in FTLD-Tau compared to FTLD-TDP across regions (beta = 4.21, SE = 0.34, p < 0.001), and correlated with the degree of WM degeneration in both FTLD-Tau (beta = 0.32, SE = 0.10, p = 0.002) and FTLD-TDP (beta = 0.40, SE = 0.08, p < 0.001). WM degeneration was greater in FTLD-Tau than FTLD-TDP particularly in middle-frontal and anterior cingulate regions (p < 0.05). Distinct regional patterns of WM and GM inclusions characterized FTLD-Tau and FTLD-TDP proteinopathies, and associated in part with clinical phenotype. In FTLD-Tau, WM pathology was particularly severe in the dorsolateral frontal cortex in nonfluent-variant PPA, and GM pathology in dorsolateral and paralimbic frontal regions with some variation across tauopathies. Differently, FTLD-TDP had little WM regional variability, but showed severe GM pathology burden in ventromedial prefrontal regions in both bvFTD and PPA. To conclude, FTLD-Tau and FTLD-TDP proteinopathies have distinct severity and regional distribution of WM and GM pathology, which may impact their clinical presentation, with overall greater severity of WM pathology as a distinguishing feature of tauopathies.

Citing Articles

Characterizing white matter and vascular pathologies in brain donors exposed to repetitive head impacts.

Emrani S, Koutures A, Tripodis Y, Uretsky M, Abdolmohammadi B, Nowinski C Acta Neuropathol. 2025; 149(1):24.

PMID: 40047953 PMC: 11885321. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-025-02860-z.


Boundary-based registration improves sensitivity for detecting hypoperfusion in sporadic frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

Mihailescu S, Hlava Q, Cook P, Mandelli M, Lee S, Boeve B Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1452944.

PMID: 39233675 PMC: 11371585. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1452944.


Neuroanatomical and cellular degeneration associated with a social disorder characterized by new ritualistic belief systems in a TDP-C patient vs. a Pick patient.

Ohm D, Rhodes E, Bahena A, Capp N, Lowe M, Sabatini P Front Neurol. 2023; 14:1245886.

PMID: 37900607 PMC: 10600461. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1245886.


The Role of Clinical Assessment in the Era of Biomarkers.

Carlos A, Josephs K Neurotherapeutics. 2023; 20(4):1001-1018.

PMID: 37594658 PMC: 10457273. DOI: 10.1007/s13311-023-01410-3.


Presymptomatic and early pathological features of MAPT-associated frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

Giannini L, Mol M, Rajicic A, van Buuren R, Sarkar L, Arezoumandan S Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2023; 11(1):126.

PMID: 37533060 PMC: 10394953. DOI: 10.1186/s40478-023-01588-9.


References
1.
Irwin D, Cairns N, Grossman M, McMillan C, Lee E, Van Deerlin V . Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: defining phenotypic diversity through personalized medicine. Acta Neuropathol. 2015; 129(4):469-91. PMC: 4369168. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-014-1380-1. View

2.
Kovacs G . Invited review: Neuropathology of tauopathies: principles and practice. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2014; 41(1):3-23. DOI: 10.1111/nan.12208. View

3.
Viskontas I, Possin K, Miller B . Symptoms of frontotemporal dementia provide insights into orbitofrontal cortex function and social behavior. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007; 1121:528-45. DOI: 10.1196/annals.1401.025. View

4.
Xie S, Forman M, Farmer J, Moore P, Wang Y, Wang X . Factors associated with survival probability in autopsy-proven frontotemporal lobar degeneration. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007; 79(2):126-9. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.110288. View

5.
Wood E, Falcone D, Suh E, Irwin D, Chen-Plotkin A, Lee E . Development and validation of pedigree classification criteria for frontotemporal lobar degeneration. JAMA Neurol. 2013; 70(11):1411-7. PMC: 3906581. DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.3956. View