» Articles » PMID: 33616756

Rapid Reduction of Macular Edema Due to Retinal Vein Occlusion with Low-dose Normobaric Hyperoxia

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2021 Feb 22
PMID 33616756
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We investigated the effects of a relatively inexpensive, non-invasive, short-term treatment with low-dose normobaric hyperoxia (NBH) on macular edema in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

Methods: Participants with macular edema associated with RVO were treated with 5 LPM of NBH via facemask (40% fraction of inspired oxygen, FIO2) for 3 h. Patients with non-fovea involving edema who elected to be observed returned for a second treatment 1 month later to test reproducibility.

Results: A 3-h session of NBH (n = 45) resulted in decreased maximum macular thickness (MMT) (mean 7.10%, t=9.63 P<.001) and central macular thickness (CMT) (mean 4.64%, t=6.90, P<.001) when compared to untreated eyes with RVO measured over the same period of time (n = 12) or their healthy fellow eye (n = 34; MMT:t=-9.60, P<.001;CMT: t=-6.72, P<.001). Patients who had a second NBH treatment 1 month later experienced a recurrence of their edema, but demonstrated a similar significant reduction in MMT and CMT after the second NBH treatment.

Conclusions: Three-hour treatment with 40% FIO2 NBH results in a significant reduction in MMT and CMT. This study supports an ischemic mechanism for macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion.

Translational Relevance: Short-term low-dose normobaric hyperoxia is a simple, inexpensive, and ubiquitous treatment that may provide an alternate or adjunctive approach to treating macular edema in patients who are resistant to or cannot afford anti-VEGF medications.

Citing Articles

Effect of FFP2/N95 facemask wear on retinal and choroidal thickness profile in healthy subjects.

Gunay B, Akalin I, Kalkisim A, Esenulku C, Turkoglu E Int J Ophthalmol. 2022; 15(11):1821-1828.

PMID: 36404981 PMC: 9631179. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2022.11.13.

References
1.
Rogers S, McIntosh R, Cheung N, Lim L, Wang J, Mitchell P . The prevalence of retinal vein occlusion: pooled data from population studies from the United States, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Ophthalmology. 2009; 117(2):313-9.e1. PMC: 2945292. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.07.017. View

2.
Laouri M, Chen E, Looman M, Gallagher M . The burden of disease of retinal vein occlusion: review of the literature. Eye (Lond). 2011; 25(8):981-8. PMC: 3178209. DOI: 10.1038/eye.2011.92. View

3.
Avila Jr C, Bartsch D, Bitner D, Cheng L, Mueller A, Karavellas M . Retinal blood flow measurements in branch retinal vein occlusion using scanning laser Doppler flowmetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998; 126(5):683-90. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(98)00114-7. View

4.
Jonas J, Harder B . Ophthalmodynamometric differences between ischemic vs nonischemic retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006; 143(1):112-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.09.019. View

5.
Ozaki H, Yu A, Della N, Ozaki K, Luna J, Yamada H . Hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha is increased in ischemic retina: temporal and spatial correlation with VEGF expression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999; 40(1):182-9. View