» Articles » PMID: 33614463

Safety, Effectiveness, and Cost-effectiveness of Argus II in Patients with Retinitis Pigmentosa: a Systematic Review

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2021 Feb 22
PMID 33614463
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To assess the effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of the Argus II in treatment of the retinitis pigmentosa (RP) patients.

Methods: The ProQuest, Web of Science, EMBASE, MEDLINE ( PubMed) were searched using combinations of the keywords of Argus, safety, effectiveness, bionic eye, retinal prosthesis, and RP through March 2018. The retrieved records were screened and then assessed for eligibility.

Results: Totally 926 records were retrieved from the searched databases and finally 12 studies included. The RP patients showed improvements in visual function after receiving the prosthesis, compared to the time before the prosthesis or the time it was off. This was measured by square localization, direction of motion, and grating visual acuity tests. No major adverse effect was reported for the Argus II prosthesis itself and/or the surgery to implement it, but the most frequently reported items were hypotony, and conjunctival dehiscence. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated to be €14603 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in UK and $207 616 per QALY in Canada.

Conclusion: The available evidence shows that the Argus II prosthesis in RP patients is effective in improvement of their visual function. Some minor adverse effects are reported for the prosthesis. The cost-effectiveness studies show that the technology is cost-effective only at high levels of willingness-to-pay.

Citing Articles

A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: A Single-Arm Clinical Trial of Feasibility.

Petoe M, Abbott C, Titchener S, Kolic M, Kentler W, Nayagam D Ophthalmol Sci. 2024; 5(1):100525.

PMID: 39328823 PMC: 11426041. DOI: 10.1016/j.xops.2024.100525.


Retinitis Pigmentosa and Therapeutic Approaches: A Systematic Review.

Confalonieri F, La Rosa A, Ottonelli G, Barone G, Ferraro V, Di Maria A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(16).

PMID: 39200821 PMC: 11355744. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13164680.


PRPF31-retinitis pigmentosa: Challenges and opportunities for clinical translation.

Aweidah H, Xi Z, Sahel J, Byrne L Vision Res. 2023; 213:108315.

PMID: 37714045 PMC: 10872823. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2023.108315.


Pars Plana Vitrectomy in Inherited Retinal Diseases: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.

Iovino C, Rosolia A, Damiano L, Iodice C, Di Iorio V, Testa F Life (Basel). 2023; 13(6).

PMID: 37374028 PMC: 10305349. DOI: 10.3390/life13061241.


Gene-agnostic approaches to treating inherited retinal degenerations.

Chew L, Iannaccone A Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023; 11:1177838.

PMID: 37123404 PMC: 10133473. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1177838.


References
1.
. Retinal Prosthesis System for Advanced Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Health Technology Assessment. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016; 16(14):1-63. PMC: 4947979. View

2.
da Cruz L, Dorn J, Humayun M, Dagnelie G, Handa J, Barale P . Five-Year Safety and Performance Results from the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System Clinical Trial. Ophthalmology. 2016; 123(10):2248-54. PMC: 5035591. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.049. View

3.
Barry M, Dagnelie G . Use of the Argus II retinal prosthesis to improve visual guidance of fine hand movements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53(9):5095-101. PMC: 3416020. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-9536. View

4.
Kotecha A, Zhong J, Stewart D, da Cruz L . The Argus II prosthesis facilitates reaching and grasping tasks: a case series. BMC Ophthalmol. 2014; 14:71. PMC: 4039311. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2415-14-71. View

5.
Hahm B, Shin Y, Shim E, Jeon H, Seo J, Chung H . Depression and the vision-related quality of life in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008; 92(5):650-4. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2007.127092. View