» Articles » PMID: 33607599

Multisensory Perception in Argus II Retinal Prosthesis Patients: Leveraging Auditory-visual Mappings to Enhance Prosthesis Outcomes

Overview
Journal Vision Res
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2021 Feb 19
PMID 33607599
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Crossmodal mappings associate features (such as spatial location) between audition and vision, thereby aiding sensory binding and perceptual accuracy. Previously, it has been unclear whether patients with artificial vision will develop crossmodal mappings despite the low spatial and temporal resolution of their visual perception (particularly in light of the remodeling of the retina and visual cortex that takes place during decades of vision loss). To address this question, we studied crossmodal mappings psychophysically in Retinitis Pigmentosa patients with partial visual restoration by means of Argus II retinal prostheses, which incorporate an electrode array implanted on the retinal surface that stimulates still-viable ganglion cells with a video stream from a head-mounted camera. We found that Argus II patients (N = 10) exhibit significant crossmodal mappings between auditory location and visual location, and between auditory pitch and visual elevation, equivalent to those of age-matched sighted controls (N = 10). Furthermore, Argus II patients (N = 6) were able to use crossmodal mappings to locate a visual target more quickly with auditory cueing than without. Overall, restored artificial vision was shown to interact with audition via crossmodal mappings, which implies that the reorganization during blindness and the limitations of artificial vision did not prevent the relearning of crossmodal mappings. In particular, cueing based on crossmodal mappings was shown to improve visual search with a retinal prosthesis. This result represents a key first step toward leveraging crossmodal interactions for improved patient visual functionality.

Citing Articles

Retinal Prostheses: Engineering and Clinical Perspectives for Vision Restoration.

Wu K, Mina M, Sahyoun J, Kalevar A, Tran S Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(13).

PMID: 37447632 PMC: 10347280. DOI: 10.3390/s23135782.


A systematic review of extended reality (XR) for understanding and augmenting vision loss.

Kasowski J, Johnson B, Neydavood R, Akkaraju A, Beyeler M J Vis. 2023; 23(5):5.

PMID: 37140911 PMC: 10166121. DOI: 10.1167/jov.23.5.5.


Implications of Neural Plasticity in Retinal Prosthesis.

Caravaca-Rodriguez D, Gaytan S, Suaning G, Barriga-Rivera A Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2022; 63(11):11.

PMID: 36251317 PMC: 9586139. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.63.11.11.


Altered Regional Homogeneity in Patients With Congenital Blindness: A Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Hu J, Jiang N, Chen J, Ying P, Kang M, Xu S Front Psychiatry. 2022; 13:925412.

PMID: 35815017 PMC: 9256957. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.925412.


Retinal Organoids and Retinal Prostheses: An Overview.

Bellapianta A, Cetkovic A, Bolz M, Salti A Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(6).

PMID: 35328339 PMC: 8953078. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23062922.


References
1.
Cappagli G, Finocchietti S, Cocchi E, Giammari G, Zumiani R, Cuppone A . Audio motor training improves mobility and spatial cognition in visually impaired children. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):3303. PMC: 6397231. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-39981-x. View

2.
Patching G, Quinlan P . Garner and congruence effects in the speeded classification of bimodal signals. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002; 28(4):755-75. View

3.
Lee D, Lee J, Oh S, Kim S, Kim J, Chung J . Cross-modal plasticity and cochlear implants. Nature. 2001; 409(6817):149-50. DOI: 10.1038/35051653. View

4.
Sandmann P, Dillier N, Eichele T, Meyer M, Kegel A, Pascual-Marqui R . Visual activation of auditory cortex reflects maladaptive plasticity in cochlear implant users. Brain. 2012; 135(Pt 2):555-68. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awr329. View

5.
Zrenner E . Fighting blindness with microelectronics. Sci Transl Med. 2013; 5(210):210ps16. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007399. View