» Articles » PMID: 26490260

Auditory Sensory Substitution is Intuitive and Automatic with Texture Stimuli

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2015 Oct 23
PMID 26490260
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Millions of people are blind worldwide. Sensory substitution (SS) devices (e.g., vOICe) can assist the blind by encoding a video stream into a sound pattern, recruiting visual brain areas for auditory analysis via crossmodal interactions and plasticity. SS devices often require extensive training to attain limited functionality. In contrast to conventional attention-intensive SS training that starts with visual primitives (e.g., geometrical shapes), we argue that sensory substitution can be engaged efficiently by using stimuli (such as textures) associated with intrinsic crossmodal mappings. Crossmodal mappings link images with sounds and tactile patterns. We show that intuitive SS sounds can be matched to the correct images by naive sighted participants just as well as by intensively-trained participants. This result indicates that existing crossmodal interactions and amodal sensory cortical processing may be as important in the interpretation of patterns by SS as crossmodal plasticity (e.g., the strengthening of existing connections or the formation of new ones), especially at the earlier stages of SS usage. An SS training procedure based on crossmodal mappings could both considerably improve participant performance and shorten training times, thereby enabling SS devices to significantly expand blind capabilities.

Citing Articles

Auditory and tactile frequency mapping for visual distance perception: A step forward in sensory substitution and augmentation.

Jiang P, Rossiter J, Kent C PLoS One. 2025; 20(3):e0318354.

PMID: 40029888 PMC: 11875370. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318354.


Perceiving depth beyond sight: Evaluating intrinsic and learned cues via a proof of concept sensory substitution method in the visually impaired and sighted.

Maimon A, Wald I, Snir A, Ben Oz M, Amedi A PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0310033.

PMID: 39321152 PMC: 11423994. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310033.


Towards sensory substitution and augmentation: Mapping visual distance to audio and tactile frequency.

Jiang P, Kent C, Rossiter J PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0299213.

PMID: 38530828 PMC: 10965077. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299213.


Improved Spatial Knowledge Acquisition through Sensory Augmentation.

Schmidt V, Konig S, Dilawar R, Sanchez Pacheco T, Konig P Brain Sci. 2023; 13(5).

PMID: 37239192 PMC: 10216147. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13050720.


Cross-modal correspondence enhances elevation localization in visual-to-auditory sensory substitution.

Bordeau C, Scalvini F, Migniot C, DuBois J, Ambard M Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1079998.

PMID: 36777233 PMC: 9909421. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1079998.


References
1.
Merabet L, Battelli L, Obretenova S, Maguire S, Meijer P, Pascual-Leone A . Functional recruitment of visual cortex for sound encoded object identification in the blind. Neuroreport. 2008; 20(2):132-8. PMC: 3951767. DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32832104dc. View

2.
Kim J, Zatorre R . Generalized learning of visual-to-auditory substitution in sighted individuals. Brain Res. 2008; 1242:263-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.06.038. View

3.
Chebat D, Schneider F, Kupers R, Ptito M . Navigation with a sensory substitution device in congenitally blind individuals. Neuroreport. 2011; 22(7):342-7. DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283462def. View

4.
Spence C . Crossmodal correspondences: a tutorial review. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011; 73(4):971-95. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-010-0073-7. View

5.
Brown D, Macpherson T, Ward J . Seeing with sound? exploring different characteristics of a visual-to-auditory sensory substitution device. Perception. 2012; 40(9):1120-35. DOI: 10.1068/p6952. View