» Articles » PMID: 33597585

Shear Stress Affects the Architecture and Cohesion of Chlorella Vulgaris Biofilms

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Feb 18
PMID 33597585
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The architecture of microalgae biofilms has been poorly investigated, in particular with respect to shear stress, which is a crucial factor in biofilm-based reactor design and operation. To investigate how microalgae biofilms respond to different hydrodynamic regimes, the architecture and cohesion of Chlorella vulgaris biofilms were studied in flow-cells at three shear stress: 1.0, 6.5 and 11.0 mPa. Biofilm physical properties and architecture dynamics were monitored using a set of microscopic techniques such as, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) and particle tracking. At low shear, biofilms cohesion was heterogeneous resulting in a strong basal (close to the substrate) layer and in more loose superficial ones. Higher shear (11.0 mPa) significantly increased the cohesion of the biofilms allowing them to grow thicker and to produce more biomass, likely due to a biological response to resist the shear stress. Interestingly, an acclimation strategy seemed also to occur which allowed the biofilms to preserve their growth rate at the different hydrodynamic regimes. Our results are in accordance with those previously reported for bacteria biofilms, revealing some general physical/mechanical rules that govern microalgae life on substrates. These results may bring new insights about how to improve productivity and stability of microalgae biofilm-based systems.

Citing Articles

Bacterial species with different nanocolony morphologies have distinct flow-dependent colonization behaviors.

Hallinen K, Bodine S, Stone H, Muir T, Wingreen N, Gitai Z Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025; 122(7):e2419899122.

PMID: 39928871 PMC: 11848407. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2419899122.


Effect of biofilm physical characteristics on their susceptibility to antibiotics: impacts of low-frequency ultrasound.

Nahum Y, Gross N, Cerrone A, Matous K, Nerenberg R NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2024; 10(1):70.

PMID: 39160204 PMC: 11333500. DOI: 10.1038/s41522-024-00544-2.


The effect of light intensity on microalgae biofilm structures and physiology under continuous illumination.

Gao Y, Bernard O, Fanesi A, Perre P, Lopes F Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):1151.

PMID: 38212356 PMC: 10784318. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50432-6.


The impact of light/dark regimes on structure and physiology of biofilms.

Gao Y, Bernard O, Fanesi A, Perre P, Lopes F Front Microbiol. 2023; 14:1250866.

PMID: 37942075 PMC: 10628651. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1250866.


Multichannel Microfluidic Platform for Temporal-Spatial Investigation of Niche Roles of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli within a Dual-Species Biofilm.

Cheah H, Bae S Appl Environ Microbiol. 2023; 89(7):e0065123.

PMID: 37382537 PMC: 10370331. DOI: 10.1128/aem.00651-23.


References
1.
Gross M, Jarboe D, Wen Z . Biofilm-based algal cultivation systems. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015; 99(14):5781-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-015-6736-5. View

2.
Mantzorou A, Ververidis F . Microalgal biofilms: A further step over current microalgal cultivation techniques. Sci Total Environ. 2018; 651(Pt 2):3187-3201. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.355. View

3.
Lawrence J, Swerhone G, Neu T . A simple rotating annular reactor for replicated biofilm studies. J Microbiol Methods. 2000; 42(3):215-24. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-7012(00)00195-0. View

4.
Stoodley P, Dodds I, Boyle J, Lappin-Scott H . Influence of hydrodynamics and nutrients on biofilm structure. J Appl Microbiol. 2010; 85 Suppl 1:19S-28S. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1998.tb05279.x. View

5.
Beyenal H, Lewandowski Z . Internal and external mass transfer in biofilms grown at various flow velocities. Biotechnol Prog. 2002; 18(1):55-61. DOI: 10.1021/bp010129s. View