» Articles » PMID: 33585702

The Diagnosis of Tuberculous Meningitis in Adults and Adolescents: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis to Inform a Multivariable Prediction Model

Overview
Date 2021 Feb 16
PMID 33585702
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is the most lethal and disabling form of tuberculosis. Delayed diagnosis and treatment, which is a risk factor for poor outcome, is caused in part by lack of availability of diagnostic tests that are both rapid and accurate. Several attempts have been made to develop clinical scoring systems to fill this gap, but none have performed sufficiently well to be broadly implemented. We aim to identify and validate a set of clinical predictors that accurately classify TBM using individual patient data (IPD) from published studies. We will perform a systematic review and obtain IPD from studies published from the year 1990 which undertook diagnostic testing for TBM in adolescents or adults using at least one of, microscopy for acid-fast bacilli, commercial nucleic acid amplification test for or mycobacterial culture of cerebrospinal fluid.  Clinical data that have previously been shown to be associated with TBM, and can inform the final diagnosis, will be requested. The data-set will be divided into training and test/validation data-sets for model building. A predictive logistic model will be built using a training set with patients with definite TBM and no TBM. Should it be warranted, factor analysis may be employed, depending on evidence for multicollinearity or the case for including latent variables in the model. We will systematically identify and extract key clinical parameters associated with TBM from published studies and use a 'big data' approach to develop and validate a clinical prediction model with enhanced generalisability. The final model will be made available through a smartphone application. Further work will be external validation of the model and test of efficacy in a randomised controlled trial.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic Prediction Model for Tuberculous Meningitis: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.

Stadelman-Behar A, Tiffin N, Ellis J, Creswell F, Ssebambulidde K, Nuwagira E Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2024; 111(3):546-553.

PMID: 39013385 PMC: 11376156. DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.23-0789.


The application value of cerebrospinal fluid immunoglobulin in tuberculous meningitis.

He H, Xu J, Peng Q, Li Y, Huang Y, Zhang Y Microbiol Spectr. 2024; 12(6):e0015724.

PMID: 38666897 PMC: 11237685. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00157-24.


Improving Technology to Diagnose Tuberculous Meningitis: Are We There Yet?.

Ssebambulidde K, Gakuru J, Ellis J, Cresswell F, Bahr N Front Neurol. 2022; 13:892224.

PMID: 35711276 PMC: 9195574. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.892224.


Modern Machine-Learning Predictive Models for Diagnosing Infectious Diseases.

Alqaissi E, Alotaibi F, Sher Ramzan M Comput Math Methods Med. 2022; 2022:6902321.

PMID: 35693267 PMC: 9185172. DOI: 10.1155/2022/6902321.


Recent Developments in Tuberculous Meningitis Pathogenesis and Diagnostics.

Cresswell F, Davis A, Sharma K, Roy R, Ganiem A, Kagimu E Wellcome Open Res. 2021; 4:164.

PMID: 33364436 PMC: 7739117. DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15506.3.


References
1.
Sauerbrei W, Royston P, Binder H . Selection of important variables and determination of functional form for continuous predictors in multivariable model building. Stat Med. 2007; 26(30):5512-28. DOI: 10.1002/sim.3148. View

2.
Debray T, Moons K, Ahmed I, Koffijberg H, Riley R . A framework for developing, implementing, and evaluating clinical prediction models in an individual participant data meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2013; 32(18):3158-80. DOI: 10.1002/sim.5732. View

3.
Boyles T, Locatelli I, Senn N, Ebell M . Determining clinical decision thresholds for HIV-positive patients suspected of having tuberculosis. Evid Based Med. 2017; 22(4):132-138. DOI: 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110718. View

4.
Wolff R, Moons K, Riley R, Whiting P, Westwood M, Collins G . PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies. Ann Intern Med. 2019; 170(1):51-58. DOI: 10.7326/M18-1376. View

5.
Jolani S, Debray T, Koffijberg H, van Buuren S, Moons K . Imputation of systematically missing predictors in an individual participant data meta-analysis: a generalized approach using MICE. Stat Med. 2015; 34(11):1841-63. DOI: 10.1002/sim.6451. View