» Articles » PMID: 33581087

Distribution of Environmental Justice Metrics for Exposure to CAFOs in North Carolina, USA

Overview
Journal Environ Res
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2021 Feb 13
PMID 33581087
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Several studies have reported environmental disparities regarding exposure to concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs). Public health implications of environmental justice from the intensive livestock industry are of great concern in North Carolina (NC), USA, a state with a large number and extensive history of CAFOs.

Objectives: We examined disparities by exposure to CAFOs using several environmental justice metrics and considering potentially vulnerable subpopulations.

Methods: We obtained data on permitted animal facilities from NC Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). Using ZIP code level variables from the 2010 Census, we evaluated environmental disparities by eight environmental justice metrics (i.e., percentage of Non-Hispanic White, Non-Hispanic Black, or Hispanic; percentage living below the poverty level; median household income; percentage with education less than high school diploma; racial residential isolation (RI) for Non-Hispanic Black; and educational residential isolation (ERI) for population without college degree). We applied two approaches to assign CAFOs exposure for each ZIP code: (1) a count method based on the number of CAFOs within ZIP code; and (2) a buffer method based on the area-weighted number of CAFOs using a 15 km buffer.

Results: Spatial distributions of CAFOs exposure generally showed similar patterns between the two exposure methods. However, some ZIP codes had different estimated CAFOs exposure for the different approaches, with higher exposure when using the buffer method. Our findings indicate that CAFOs are located disproportionately in communities with higher percentage of minorities and in low-income communities. Distributions of environmental justice metrics generally showed similar patterns for both exposure methods, however starker disparities were observed using a buffer method.

Conclusions: Our findings of the disproportionate location of CAFOs provide evidence of environmental disparities with respect to race and socioeconomic status in NC and have implications for future studies of environmental and health impacts of CAFOs.

Citing Articles

Satellite Observations of Atmospheric Ammonia Inequalities Associated with Industrialized Swine Facilities in Eastern North Carolina.

Epps A, Dressel I, Guo X, Odanibe M, Fields K, Carlton A Environ Sci Technol. 2025; 59(5):2651-2664.

PMID: 39878342 PMC: 11823455. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c11922.


Hurricanes, industrial animal operations, and acute gastrointestinal illness in North Carolina, USA.

Quist A, Fliss M, Richardson D, Delamater P, Engel L Environ Res Health. 2025; 3(1):015005.

PMID: 39759183 PMC: 11696836. DOI: 10.1088/2752-5309/ad9ecf.


Disparities in exposure to concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) and risk of adverse birth outcomes in Pennsylvania, USA.

Son J, Bell M Heliyon. 2024; 10(15):e34985.

PMID: 39145018 PMC: 11320432. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34985.


A systematic review of animal feeding operations including concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) for exposure, health outcomes, and environmental justice.

Son J, Heo S, Byun G, Foo D, Song Y, Lewis B Environ Res. 2024; 259:119550.

PMID: 38964578 PMC: 11365793. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119550.


Residents' experiences during a hydrogen sulfide crisis in Carson, California.

Quist A, Hovav A, Silverman A, Shamasunder B, Johnston J Environ Health. 2024; 23(1):31.

PMID: 38519920 PMC: 10960400. DOI: 10.1186/s12940-024-01071-5.


References
1.
Wing S, Wolf S . Intensive livestock operations, health, and quality of life among eastern North Carolina residents. Environ Health Perspect. 2000; 108(3):233-8. PMC: 1637983. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.00108233. View

2.
Wing S, Freedman S, Band L . The potential impact of flooding on confined animal feeding operations in eastern North Carolina. Environ Health Perspect. 2002; 110(4):387-91. PMC: 1240801. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.02110387. View

3.
Guidry V, Rhodes S, Woods C, Hall D, Rinsky J . Connecting Environmental Justice and Community Health: Effects of Hog Production in North Carolina. N C Med J. 2018; 79(5):324-328. DOI: 10.18043/ncm.79.5.324. View

4.
Sigurdarson S, Kline J . School proximity to concentrated animal feeding operations and prevalence of asthma in students. Chest. 2006; 129(6):1486-91. DOI: 10.1378/chest.129.6.1486. View

5.
Borlee F, Yzermans C, Aalders B, Rooijackers J, Krop E, Maassen C . Air Pollution from Livestock Farms Is Associated with Airway Obstruction in Neighboring Residents. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017; 196(9):1152-1161. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201701-0021OC. View