» Articles » PMID: 10706529

Intensive Livestock Operations, Health, and Quality of Life Among Eastern North Carolina Residents

Overview
Date 2000 Mar 8
PMID 10706529
Citations 63
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

People who live near industrial swine operations have reported decreased health and quality of life. To investigate these issues, we surveyed residents of three rural communities, one in the vicinity of an approximately 6,000-head hog operation, one in the vicinity of two intensive cattle operations, and a third rural agricultural area without livestock operations that use liquid waste management systems. Trained interviewers obtained information about health symptoms and reduced quality of life during the previous 6 months. We completed 155 interviews, with a refusal rate of 14%. Community differences in the mean number of episodes were compared with adjustment for age, sex, smoking, and employment status. The average number of episodes of many symptoms was similar in the three communities; however, certain respiratory and gastrointestinal problems and mucous membrane irritation were elevated among residents in the vicinity of the hog operation. Residents in the vicinity of the hog operation reported increased occurrences of headaches, runny nose, sore throat, excessive coughing, diarrhea, and burning eyes as compared to residents of the community with no intensive livestock operations. Quality of life, as indicated by the number of times residents could not open their windows or go outside even in nice weather, was similar in the control and the community in the vicinity of the cattle operation but greatly reduced among residents near the hog operation. Respiratory and mucous membrane effects were consistent with the results of studies of occupational exposures among swine confinement-house workers and previous findings for neighbors of intensive swine operations. Long-term physical and mental health impacts could not be investigated in this study.

Citing Articles

Satellite Observations of Atmospheric Ammonia Inequalities Associated with Industrialized Swine Facilities in Eastern North Carolina.

Epps A, Dressel I, Guo X, Odanibe M, Fields K, Carlton A Environ Sci Technol. 2025; 59(5):2651-2664.

PMID: 39878342 PMC: 11823455. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c11922.


Hurricanes, industrial animal operations, and acute gastrointestinal illness in North Carolina, USA.

Quist A, Fliss M, Richardson D, Delamater P, Engel L Environ Res Health. 2025; 3(1):015005.

PMID: 39759183 PMC: 11696836. DOI: 10.1088/2752-5309/ad9ecf.


Local and Global Public Health and Emissions from Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations in the USA: A Scoping Review.

Pohl E, Lee S Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(7).

PMID: 39063493 PMC: 11276819. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21070916.


Occupational farm work activities influence workers' indoor home microbiome.

Dalton K, Lee M, Wang Z, Zhao S, Parks C, Beane-Freeman L Environ Res. 2023; 243:117819.

PMID: 38052359 PMC: 10872285. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117819.


Bearing the Brunt: Who Breathes the Air Pollutants from Hog CAFOs in North Carolina?.

Schmidt S Environ Health Perspect. 2023; 131(8):84003.

PMID: 37647125 PMC: 10467815. DOI: 10.1289/EHP13526.


References
1.
Donham K, Reynolds S, Whitten P, Merchant J, Burmeister L, Popendorf W . Respiratory dysfunction in swine production facility workers: dose-response relationships of environmental exposures and pulmonary function. Am J Ind Med. 1995; 27(3):405-18. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.4700270309. View

2.
Taylor D . Fresh from the farm. Environ Health Perspect. 1999; 107(3):A154-7. PMC: 1566375. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.99107a154. View

3.
Olson D, Bark S . Health hazards affecting the animal confinement farm worker. AAOHN J. 1996; 44(4):198-204; quiz 205-6. View

4.
Vogelzang P, van der Gulden J, Preller L, Heederik D, Tielen M, van Schayck C . Respiratory morbidity in relationship to farm characteristics in swine confinement work: possible preventive measures. Am J Ind Med. 1996; 30(2):212-8. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199608)30:2<212::AID-AJIM13>3.0.CO;2-#. View

5.
Cormier Y, Duchaine C, Israel-Assayag E, Bedard G, Laviolette M, Dosman J . Effects of repeated swine building exposures on normal naive subjects. Eur Respir J. 1997; 10(7):1516-22. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.97.10071516. View