» Articles » PMID: 33572738

Greater Power but Not Strength Gains Using Flywheel Versus Equivolumed Traditional Strength Training in Junior Basketball Players

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Feb 12
PMID 33572738
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The main aim of the present study was to compare the effects of flywheel strength training and traditional strength training on fitness attributes. Thirty-six well trained junior basketball players (n = 36; 17.58 ± 0.50 years) were recruited and randomly allocated into: Flywheel group (FST; n = 12), traditional strength training group (TST; n = 12) and control group (CON; n = 12). All groups attended 5 basketball practices and one official match a week during the study period. Experimental groups additionally participated in the eight-week, 1-2 d/w equivolume intervention conducted using a flywheel device (inertia = 0.075 kg·m) for FST or free weights (80%1 RM) for TST. Pre-to post changes in lower limb isometric strength (ISOMET), 5 and 20 m sprint time (SPR5m and SPR20m), countermovement jump height (CMJ) and change of direction ability (-test) were assessed with analyses of variance (3 × 2 ANOVA). Significant group-by-time interaction was found for ISOMET (F = 6.40; = 0.000), CMJ (F = 7.45; = 0.001), SPR5m (F = 7.45; = 0.010) and T test (F = 10.46; = 0.000). The results showed a significantly higher improvement in CMJ ( = 0.006; 11.7% vs. 6.8%), SPR5m ( = 0.001; 10.3% vs. 5.9%) and -test ( = 0.045; 2.4% vs. 1.5%) for FST compared to the TST group. Simultaneously, th FST group had higher improvement in ISOMET ( = 0.014; 18.7% vs. 2.9%), CMJ ( = 0.000; 11.7% vs. 0.3%), SPR5m ( = 0.000; 10.3% vs. 3.4%) and -test ( = 0.000; 2.4% vs. 0.6%) compared to the CON group. Players from the TST group showed better results in CMJ ( = 0.006; 6.8% vs. 0.3%) and -test ( = 0.018; 1.5% vs. 0.6%) compared to players from the CON group. No significant group-by-time interaction was found for sprint 20 m (F = 2.52; = 0.088). Eight weeks of flywheel training (1-2 sessions per week) performed at maximum concentric intensity induces superior improvements in CMJ, 5 m sprint time and change of direction ability than equivolumed traditional weight training in well trained junior basketball players. Accordingly, coaches and trainers could be advised to use flywheel training for developing power related performance attributes in young basketball players.

Citing Articles

Eight-Week Flywheel Training Enhances Jump Performance and Stretch-Shortening Cycle Function in Collegiate Basketball Players.

Shimizu T, Tsuchiya Y, Ueda H, Izumi S, Ochi E Eur J Sport Sci. 2025; 25(2):e12257.

PMID: 39875211 PMC: 11774620. DOI: 10.1002/ejsc.12257.


The impact of eccentric training on athlete movement speed: a systematic review.

Zhang Y, Zhuang Y, Zhang L, Sun M Front Physiol. 2024; 15:1492023.

PMID: 39735722 PMC: 11671480. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1492023.


The impact of flywheel resistance squat training on lower limb strength in female college basketball players.

Xie L, Qu W, Dai J, Xu J, Zhang W, Sun J Front Physiol. 2024; 15:1491957.

PMID: 39655280 PMC: 11625767. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1491957.


Flywheel resistance training promotes unique muscle architectural and performance-related adaptations in young adults.

Banks N, Berry A, Rogers E, Jenkins N Eur J Sport Sci. 2024; 24(12):1765-1778.

PMID: 39498804 PMC: 11621374. DOI: 10.1002/ejsc.12215.


Effects of Inertial Flywheel Training vs. Accentuated Eccentric Loading Training on Strength, Power, and Speed in Well-Trained Male College Sprinters.

Hu Z, Liu Y, Huang K, Huang H, Zhang Y, Yuan X Life (Basel). 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 39337865 PMC: 11433371. DOI: 10.3390/life14091081.


References
1.
Hernandez-Davo J, Sabido R, Behm D, Blazevich A . Effects of resistance training using known vs unknown loads on eccentric-phase adaptations and concentric velocity. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017; 28(2):407-417. DOI: 10.1111/sms.12933. View

2.
Sagelv E, Pedersen S, Nilsen L, Casolo A, Welde B, Randers M . Flywheel squats versus free weight high load squats for improving high velocity movements in football. A randomized controlled trial. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2020; 12:61. PMC: 7532637. DOI: 10.1186/s13102-020-00210-y. View

3.
Markovic G, Dizdar D, Jukic I, Cardinale M . Reliability and factorial validity of squat and countermovement jump tests. J Strength Cond Res. 2004; 18(3):551-5. DOI: 10.1519/1533-4287(2004)18<551:RAFVOS>2.0.CO;2. View

4.
Sheppard J, Young K . Using additional eccentric loads to increase concentric performance in the bench throw. J Strength Cond Res. 2010; 24(10):2853-6. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e2731b. View

5.
Behm D, Sale D . Intended rather than actual movement velocity determines velocity-specific training response. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1993; 74(1):359-68. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1993.74.1.359. View