» Articles » PMID: 33570976

How Do Neural Processes Give Rise to Cognition? Simultaneously Predicting Brain and Behavior with a Dynamic Model of Visual Working Memory

Overview
Journal Psychol Rev
Specialty Psychology
Date 2021 Feb 11
PMID 33570976
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is consensus that activation within distributed functional brain networks underlies human thought. The impact of this consensus is limited, however, by a gap that exists between data-driven correlational analyses that specify where functional brain activity is localized using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and neural process accounts that specify how neural activity unfolds through time to give rise to behavior. Here, we show how an integrative cognitive neuroscience approach may bridge this gap. In an exemplary study of visual working memory, we use multilevel Bayesian statistics to demonstrate that a neural dynamic model simultaneously explains behavioral data and predicts localized patterns of brain activity, outperforming standard analytic approaches to fMRI. The model explains performance on both correct trials and incorrect trials where errors in change detection emerge from neural fluctuations amplified by neural interaction. Critically, predictions of the model run counter to cognitive theories of the origin of errors in change detection. Results reveal neural patterns predicted by the model within regions of the dorsal attention network that have been the focus of much debate. The model-based analysis suggests that key areas in the dorsal attention network such as the intraparietal sulcus play a central role in change detection rather than working memory maintenance, counter to previous interpretations of fMRI studies. More generally, the integrative cognitive neuroscience approach used here establishes a framework for directly testing theories of cognitive and brain function using the combined power of behavioral and fMRI data. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Citing Articles

Dynamic Field Theory of Executive Function: Identifying Early Neurocognitive Markers.

McCraw A, Sullivan J, Lowery K, Eddings R, Heim H, Buss A Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2024; 89(3):7-109.

PMID: 39628288 PMC: 11615565. DOI: 10.1111/mono.12478.


Stochastic attractor models of visual working memory.

Penny W PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0301039.

PMID: 38568927 PMC: 10990203. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301039.


Towards a better understanding of information storage in visual working memory.

Xu Y Vis cogn. 2022; 29(7):437-445.

PMID: 35496937 PMC: 9053365. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2021.1946230.


Testing predictions of a neural process model of visual attention in infancy across competitive and non-competitive contexts.

Spencer J, Ross-Sheehy S, Eschman B Infancy. 2022; 27(2):389-411.

PMID: 35174955 PMC: 9305161. DOI: 10.1111/infa.12457.


Understanding occipital and parietal contributions to visual working memory: Commentary on Xu (2020).

Teng C, Postle B Vis cogn. 2021; 29(7):401-408.

PMID: 34335071 PMC: 8323545. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2021.1883171.

References
1.
Thelen E, Schoner G, Scheier C, Smith L . The dynamics of embodiment: a field theory of infant perseverative reaching. Behav Brain Sci. 2001; 24(1):1-34; discussion 34-86. DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x01003910. View

2.
Hyun J, Woodman G, Vogel E, Hollingworth A, Luck S . The comparison of visual working memory representations with perceptual inputs. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009; 35(4):1140-60. PMC: 2726625. DOI: 10.1037/a0015019. View

3.
Bays P, Catalao R, Husain M . The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource. J Vis. 2009; 9(10):7.1-11. PMC: 3118422. DOI: 10.1167/9.10.7. View

4.
Luck S, Vogel E . Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013; 17(8):391-400. PMC: 3729738. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.006. View

5.
Gao Z, Xu X, Chen Z, Yin J, Shen M, Shui R . Contralateral delay activity tracks object identity information in visual short term memory. Brain Res. 2011; 1406:30-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.06.049. View