» Articles » PMID: 33568218

Effects of Training Podiatrists to Use Imagery-based Motivational Interviewing when Treating People with Diabetes-related Foot Disease: a Mixed-methods Pilot Study

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2021 Feb 11
PMID 33568218
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Self-care in diabetes related foot disease (DFD) is challenging and contributes to poor outcomes. Motivational Interviewing (MI) can engage people in self-care and modifying it by integrating imagery may further improve its outcomes. No previous studies have trained podiatrists in using MI to address DFD self-care. This was the first study on training podiatrists to conduct imagery-based motivational interviewing (MI) when treating people with DFD, and to examine impacts on MI related skills, job satisfaction and subjective experiences in a mixed-methods pilot study.

Methods: Eleven recruited podiatrists (median age: 35 years, 9 female and 2 male) received two 4-h training sessions, and three received subsequent mentoring. MI and imagery skills were rated using validated tools during two clinical sessions per participant at baseline, and 2- and 12-weeks post-training. Job satisfaction was assessed at baseline and 12 weeks. Semi-structured interviews at 12 weeks were analysed using the framework approach.

Results: Significant improvements over time (p = .006-.044) with substantial effect sizes (η = .50-.67) were found in three of four global MI related communication skills and two of four MI behaviours. However, effects on these indices were not sustained to 12 weeks, and imagery was rarely used. Job satisfaction was high at baseline and unchanged at follow-up (p = 0.34, η = .100). In qualitative interviews, MI training and skills were valued, but significant challenges in using MI when treating people with DFD were reported.

Conclusion: Training podiatrists in MI may have potential but more training, observation and mentoring appear needed to obtain sustained communication changes in practice.

Citing Articles

Exploring the psychosocial burden of foot complications in diabetes: A cross-sectional survey and qualitative interview study in a United Kingdom coastal community.

Chapman L, Cochrane S, Sykes G, Gill J, Nixon J, Jayagopal V J Foot Ankle Res. 2024; 17(3):e12038.

PMID: 38951736 PMC: 11633363. DOI: 10.1002/jfa2.12038.


Motivational Interviewing: Addressing Interest Among Health Professions Students.

Lajaunie A, Vela N, Kimmel Supron H, Small S, Resnicow K, Poling P PRiMER. 2024; 8:35.

PMID: 38946753 PMC: 11212694. DOI: 10.22454/PRiMER.2024.823357.


The Why, What and Where Podcast on the Updated 2023 IWGDF Guideline on Offloading Treatments for Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers.

Bus S, Lazzarini P Diabetes Ther. 2024; .

PMID: 38520602 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-023-01522-1.


Objectively assessed long-term wearing patterns and predictors of wearing orthopaedic footwear in people with diabetes at moderate-to-high risk of foot ulceration: a 12 months observational study.

Exterkate S, Jongebloed-Westra M, Ten Klooster P, Koffijberg H, Bode C, van Gemert-Pijnen J J Foot Ankle Res. 2023; 16(1):60.

PMID: 37705016 PMC: 10500813. DOI: 10.1186/s13047-023-00656-6.


Where do you stand?: an exploration of perspectives toward feet, foot health, and footwear using innovative digital methods.

Skidmore S, Prior Y, Nester C, Bird S, Vasilica C J Foot Ankle Res. 2023; 16(1):25.

PMID: 37106384 PMC: 10141949. DOI: 10.1186/s13047-023-00621-3.


References
1.
Coffey L, Mahon C, Gallagher P . Perceptions and experiences of diabetic foot ulceration and foot care in people with diabetes: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Int Wound J. 2018; 16(1):183-210. PMC: 7949356. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13010. View

2.
Baker A, Kavanagh D, Kay-Lambkin F, Hunt S, Lewin T, Carr V . Randomized controlled trial of MICBT for co-existing alcohol misuse and depression: outcomes to 36-months. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013; 46(3):281-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2013.10.001. View

3.
Armstrong D, Boulton A, Bus S . Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Their Recurrence. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376(24):2367-2375. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1615439. View

4.
Solbrig L, Whalley B, Kavanagh D, May J, Parkin T, Jones R . Functional imagery training versus motivational interviewing for weight loss: a randomised controlled trial of brief individual interventions for overweight and obesity. Int J Obes (Lond). 2018; 43(4):883-894. DOI: 10.1038/s41366-018-0122-1. View

5.
Emmons K, Rollnick S . Motivational interviewing in health care settings. Opportunities and limitations. Am J Prev Med. 2001; 20(1):68-74. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00254-3. View