» Articles » PMID: 34577864

Knee-High Devices Are Gold in Closing the Foot Ulcer Gap: A Review of Offloading Treatments to Heal Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Sep 28
PMID 34577864
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are a leading cause of the global disease burden. Most DFUs are caused, and prolonged, by high plantar tissue stress under the insensate foot of a person with peripheral neuropathy. Multiple different offloading treatments have been used to try to reduce high plantar tissue stress and heal DFUs, including bedrest, casting, offloading devices, footwear, and surgical procedures. The best offloading treatments are those that balance the benefits of maximizing reductions in high plantar tissue stress, whilst reducing the risks of poor satisfaction, high costs and potential adverse events outcomes. This review aimed to summarize the best available evidence on the effects of offloading treatments to heal people with DFUs, plus review their use in clinical practice, the common barriers and solutions to using these treatments, and discuss promising emerging solutions that may improve offloading treatments in future. Findings demonstrate that knee-high offloading devices, non-removable or removable knee-high devices worn for all weight-bearing activities, are the gold standard offloading treatments to heal most patients with DFU, as they are much more effective, and typically safer, quicker, and cheaper to use compared with other offloading treatments. The effectiveness of offloading treatments also seems to increase when increased offloading mechanical features are incorporated within treatments, including customized insoles, rocker-bottom soles, controlled ankle motion, and higher cast walls. However, in clinical practice these gold standard knee-high offloading devices have low rates of prescription by clinicians and low rates of acceptance or adherence by patients. The common barriers resulting in this low use seem to surround historical misperceptions that are mostly dispelled by contemporary evidence. Further, research is now urgently required to close the implementation gap between the high-quality of supporting evidence and the low use of knee-high devices in clinical practice to reduce the high global disease burden of DFU in future.

Citing Articles

Early mobilization program with nonweight-bearing brace improves functional capacity after diabetic foot ulcer surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Qin X, Gao L, Wang S, Wang J Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025; 410(1):33.

PMID: 39792282 PMC: 11723886. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-025-03604-z.


Natural products in the treatment of diabetic foot infection.

Nazari M, Shokoohizadeh L, Taheri M Eur J Med Res. 2025; 30(1):8.

PMID: 39773682 PMC: 11705749. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-024-02255-y.


A mouldable fibreglass backslab device as a novel approach to offload chronic plantar foot ulcers: A retrospective observational audit.

Ting M, Ferreira I, Hiew J, McEvoy M, Tan G, Shah P J Foot Ankle Res. 2024; 17(3):e70001.

PMID: 39169647 PMC: 11339119. DOI: 10.1002/jfa2.70001.


Extracellular matrix-inspired biomaterials for wound healing.

Hosty L, Heatherington T, Quondamatteo F, Browne S Mol Biol Rep. 2024; 51(1):830.

PMID: 39037470 PMC: 11263448. DOI: 10.1007/s11033-024-09750-9.


The Stress of Measuring Plantar Tissue Stress in People with Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers: Biomechanical and Feasibility Findings from Two Prospective Cohort Studies.

Hulshof C, Page M, van Baal S, Bus S, Fernando M, van Gemert-Pijnen L Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(8).

PMID: 38676030 PMC: 11054765. DOI: 10.3390/s24082411.


References
1.
Lin T, Sheen H, Chung C, Yang S, Lin S, Luo H . The effect of removing plugs and adding arch support to foam based insoles on plantar pressures in people with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. J Foot Ankle Res. 2013; 6(1):29. PMC: 3750449. DOI: 10.1186/1757-1146-6-29. View

2.
Lutjeboer T, van Netten J, Postema K, Hijmans J . Validity and feasibility of a temperature sensor for measuring use and non-use of orthopaedic footwear. J Rehabil Med. 2018; 50(10):920-926. DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2494. View

3.
Fernando M, Crowther R, Lazzarini P, Sangla K, Cunningham M, Buttner P . Biomechanical characteristics of peripheral diabetic neuropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of findings from the gait cycle, muscle activity and dynamic barefoot plantar pressure. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2013; 28(8):831-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.08.004. View

4.
Abbott C, Chatwin K, Foden P, Hasan A, Sange C, Rajbhandari S . Innovative intelligent insole system reduces diabetic foot ulcer recurrence at plantar sites: a prospective, randomised, proof-of-concept study. Lancet Digit Health. 2020; 1(6):e308-e318. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30128-1. View

5.
Prompers L, Huijberts M, Apelqvist J, Jude E, Piaggesi A, Bakker K . Delivery of care to diabetic patients with foot ulcers in daily practice: results of the Eurodiale Study, a prospective cohort study. Diabet Med. 2008; 25(6):700-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02445.x. View