» Articles » PMID: 33561924

Laser Methane Detector-based Quantification of Methane Emissions from Indoor-fed Fogera Dairy Cows

Overview
Journal Anim Biosci
Date 2021 Feb 9
PMID 33561924
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Portable laser methane detectors (LMDs) may be an economical means of estimating CH4 emissions from ruminants. We validated an LMD-based approach and then used that approach to evaluate CH4 emissions from indigenous dairy cows in a dryland area of Ethiopia.

Methods: First, we validated our LMD-based approach in Simmental crossbred beef cattle (n = 2) housed in respiration chambers and fed either a high- or low-concentrate diet. From the results of the validation, we constructed an estimation equation to determine CH4 emissions from LMD CH4 concentrations. Next, we used our validated LMD approach to examine CH4 emissions in Fogera dairy cows grazed for 8 h/d (GG, n = 4), fed indoors on natural-grassland hay (CG1, n = 4), or fed indoors on Napier-grass (Pennisetum purpureum) hay (CG2, n = 4). All the cows were supplemented with concentrate feed.

Results: The exhaled CH4 concentrations measured by LMD were linearly correlated with the CH4 emissions determined by infrared-absorption-based gas analyzer (r2 = 0.55). The estimation equation used to determine CH4 emissions (y, mg/min) from LMD CH4 concentrations (x, ppm m) was y = 0.4259x+38.61. Daily CH4 emissions of Fogera cows estimated by using the equation did not differ among the three groups; however, a numerically greater milk yield was obtained from the CG2 cows than from the GG cows, suggesting that Napiergrass hay might be better than natural-grassland hay for indoor feeding. The CG1 cows had higher CH4 emissions per feed intake than the other groups, without significant increases in milk yield and body-weight gain, suggesting that natural-grassland hay cannot be recommended for indoor-fed cows.

Conclusion: These findings demonstrate the potential of using LMDs to valuate feeding regimens rapidly and economically for dairy cows in areas under financial constraint, while taking CH4 emissions into consideration.

Citing Articles

Effect of best bet methane abatement feed on feed intake, digestibility, live weight change, and methane emission in local Menz breed sheep in Ethiopia.

Bekele W, Zegeye A, Simachew A, Kobayashi N Front Vet Sci. 2025; 12:1538758.

PMID: 40027360 PMC: 11868066. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1538758.


Metataxonomic and metabolomic profiling revealed Pinus koraiensis cone essential oil reduced methane emission through affecting ruminal microbial interactions and host-microbial metabolism.

Choi Y, Lee S, Kim H, Eom J, Jo S, Guan L Anim Microbiome. 2024; 6(1):37.

PMID: 38943213 PMC: 11212255. DOI: 10.1186/s42523-024-00325-4.


Advances in Methane Emission Estimation in Livestock: A Review of Data Collection Methods, Model Development and the Role of AI Technologies.

Nejad J, Ju M, Jo J, Oh K, Lee Y, Lee S Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(3).

PMID: 38338080 PMC: 10854801. DOI: 10.3390/ani14030435.


A Longitudinal Study with a Laser Methane Detector (LMD) Highlighting Lactation Cycle-Related Differences in Methane Emissions from Dairy Cows.

Pereira A, Peixoto P, Rosa H, Vouzela C, Madruga J, Borba A Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(6).

PMID: 36978516 PMC: 10044636. DOI: 10.3390/ani13060974.


Application of a hand-held laser methane detector for measuring enteric methane emissions from cattle in intensive farming.

Kang K, Cho H, Jeong S, Jeon S, Lee M, Lee S J Anim Sci. 2022; 100(8).

PMID: 35671336 PMC: 9387598. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skac211.

References
1.
Hammond K, Jones A, Humphries D, Crompton L, Reynolds C . Effects of diet forage source and neutral detergent fiber content on milk production of dairy cattle and methane emissions determined using GreenFeed and respiration chamber techniques. J Dairy Sci. 2016; 99(10):7904-7917. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2015-10759. View

2.
Dong L, Li B, Diao Q . Effects of Dietary Forage Proportion on Feed Intake, Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, and Enteric Methane Emissions of Holstein Heifers at Various Growth Stages. Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(10). PMC: 6826458. DOI: 10.3390/ani9100725. View

3.
Van Soest P, Robertson J, Lewis B . Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 1991; 74(10):3583-97. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2. View

4.
Niu M, Kebreab E, Hristov A, Oh J, Arndt C, Bannink A . Prediction of enteric methane production, yield, and intensity in dairy cattle using an intercontinental database. Glob Chang Biol. 2018; 24(8):3368-3389. PMC: 6055644. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14094. View

5.
Hristov A, Oh J, Firkins J, Dijkstra J, Kebreab E, Waghorn G . Special topics--Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options. J Anim Sci. 2013; 91(11):5045-69. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-6583. View