» Articles » PMID: 31752083

Effects of the Diet Inclusion of Common Vetch Hay Versus Alfalfa Hay on the Body Weight Gain, Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency, Energy Balance, and Enteric Methane Emissions of Crossbred Simmental Cattle

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2019 Nov 23
PMID 31752083
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A low nitrogen utilization efficiency (NUE, the ratio of retained N to N intake) and high methane (CH) emissions of ruminants can lead to potentially high diet protein wastage and directly contribute to global warming. Diet manipulation is the most effective way to improve NUE or reduce CH emissions. This study investigated how replacing oat hay with alfalfa hay (AH) or common vetch hay (CVH) with different proportions (20% (20) and 40% (40) of the total dry matter (DM) allowance) affects the body weight gain (BWG), NUE, and CH emissions of crossbred Simmental cattle. The forage dry matter intake (DMI) and the total DMI of cattle fed on a CVH40 diet were significantly higher than the values for those fed on AH20 or AH40 diets ( < 0.05). There were no differences in the BWG for the four treatments observed, however, nutrient digestibility significantly decreased in the AH40 diet as compared with the AH20 diet ( < 0.05). The NUE was significantly lower in AH40 than in CVH20. The CH emissions were significantly lower for the CVH40 diet than with the AH20 diet ( < 0.05). Our findings suggest that a 20% AH and 40% CVH substitution for oat hay are the optimal proportions to maintain the BWG, NUE, nutrient digestibility, and reduce the CH emissions of crossbred Simmental cattle. Overall, CVH has a greater potential to reduce CH emissions than AH.

Citing Articles

The roles of phytogenic feed additives, trees, shrubs, and forages on mitigating ruminant methane emission.

Bature I, Xiaohu W, Ding X Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1475322.

PMID: 39649683 PMC: 11622700. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1475322.


Effect of Replacing Alfalfa Hay with Common Vetch Hay in Sheep Diets on Growth Performance, Rumen Fermentation and Rumen Microbiota.

Ren C, Zhang X, Wei H, Wang S, Wang W, He L Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(15).

PMID: 39123708 PMC: 11310988. DOI: 10.3390/ani14152182.


Effect of incremental proportions of Desmanthus spp. in isonitrogenous forage diets on growth performance, rumen fermentation and plasma metabolites of pen-fed growing Brahman, Charbray and Droughtmaster crossbred beef steers.

Mwangi F, Suybeng B, Gardiner C, Kinobe R, Charmley E, Malau-Aduli B PLoS One. 2022; 17(1):e0260918.

PMID: 34982779 PMC: 8726496. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260918.


Laser methane detector-based quantification of methane emissions from indoor-fed Fogera dairy cows.

Kobayashi N, Hou F, Tsunekawa A, Yan T, Tegegne F, Tassew A Anim Biosci. 2021; 34(8):1415-1424.

PMID: 33561924 PMC: 8255885. DOI: 10.5713/ab.20.0739.

References
1.
Graham P, Vance C . Legumes: importance and constraints to greater use. Plant Physiol. 2003; 131(3):872-7. PMC: 1540286. DOI: 10.1104/pp.017004. View

2.
Dong L, Li B, Diao Q . Effects of Dietary Forage Proportion on Feed Intake, Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, and Enteric Methane Emissions of Holstein Heifers at Various Growth Stages. Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(10). PMC: 6826458. DOI: 10.3390/ani9100725. View

3.
Waldrip H, Todd R, Cole N . Prediction of nitrogen excretion by beef cattle: a meta-analysis. J Anim Sci. 2013; 91(9):4290-302. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2012-5818. View

4.
Montes F, Meinen R, Dell C, Rotz A, Hristov A, Oh J . Special topics--Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: II. A review of manure management mitigation options. J Anim Sci. 2013; 91(11):5070-94. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-6584. View

5.
Ipharraguerre I, Clark J . Varying protein and starch in the diet of dairy cows. II. Effects on performance and nitrogen utilization for milk production. J Dairy Sci. 2005; 88(7):2556-70. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72932-5. View