» Articles » PMID: 33547592

Imaging-Based Outcome Prediction of Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Abstract

We hypothesized that imaging-only-based machine learning algorithms can analyze non-enhanced CT scans of patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). This retrospective multicenter cohort study analyzed 520 non-enhanced CT scans and clinical data of patients with acute spontaneous ICH. Clinical outcome at hospital discharge was dichotomized into good outcome and poor outcome using different modified Rankin Scale (mRS) cut-off values. Predictive performance of a random forest machine learning approach based on filter- and texture-derived high-end image features was evaluated for differentiation of functional outcome at mRS 2, 3, and 4. Prediction of survival (mRS ≤ 5) was compared to results of the ICH Score. All models were tuned, validated, and tested in a nested 5-fold cross-validation approach. Receiver-operating-characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC) of the machine learning classifier using image features only was 0.80 (95% CI [0.77; 0.82]) for predicting mRS ≤ 2, 0.80 (95% CI [0.78; 0.81]) for mRS ≤ 3, and 0.79 (95% CI [0.77; 0.80]) for mRS ≤ 4. Trained on survival prediction (mRS ≤ 5), the classifier reached an AUC of 0.80 (95% CI [0.78; 0.82]) which was equivalent to results of the ICH Score. If combined, the integrated model showed a significantly higher AUC of 0.84 (95% CI [0.83; 0.86], P value <0.05). Accordingly, sensitivities were significantly higher at Youden Index maximum cut-offs (77% vs. 74% sensitivity at 76% specificity, P value <0.05). Machine learning-based evaluation of quantitative high-end image features provided the same discriminatory power in predicting functional outcome as multidimensional clinical scoring systems. The integration of conventional scores and image features had synergistic effects with a statistically significant increase in AUC.

Citing Articles

Early NCCT imaging signs for prognostication in intracerebral hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort study with long follow up results.

Deng R, Wu C, Zhang L, Wang J, Guo J, Yang Z BMC Neurol. 2025; 25(1):91.

PMID: 40050793 PMC: 11883969. DOI: 10.1186/s12883-025-04100-z.


External validation and performance analysis of a deep learning-based model for the detection of intracranial hemorrhage.

Nada A, Sayed A, Hamouda M, Tantawi M, Khan A, Alt A Neuroradiol J. 2024; :19714009241303078.

PMID: 39601611 PMC: 11603421. DOI: 10.1177/19714009241303078.


Bibliometric and visualized analysis of the application of artificial intelligence in stroke.

Xu F, Dai Z, Ye Y, Hu P, Cheng H Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1411538.

PMID: 39323917 PMC: 11422388. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1411538.


Revolutionizing Intracranial Hemorrhage Diagnosis: A Retrospective Analytical Study of Viz.ai ICH for Enhanced Diagnostic Accuracy.

Roshan M, Al-Shaikhli S, Linfante I, Antony T, Clarke J, Noman R Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e66449.

PMID: 39246948 PMC: 11380645. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.66449.


An interpretable artificial intelligence model based on CT for prognosis of intracerebral hemorrhage: a multicenter study.

Zhang H, Yang Y, Song X, Hu H, Yang Y, Zhu X BMC Med Imaging. 2024; 24(1):170.

PMID: 38982357 PMC: 11234657. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-024-01352-y.


References
1.
Aerts H . The Potential of Radiomic-Based Phenotyping in Precision Medicine: A Review. JAMA Oncol. 2016; 2(12):1636-1642. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.2631. View

2.
DRURY I, Whisnant J, Garraway W . Primary intracerebral hemorrhage: impact of CT on incidence. Neurology. 1984; 34(5):653-7. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.34.5.653. View

3.
Broderick J, Brott T, Duldner J, Tomsick T, Huster G . Volume of intracerebral hemorrhage. A powerful and easy-to-use predictor of 30-day mortality. Stroke. 1993; 24(7):987-93. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.24.7.987. View

4.
Gregorio T, Pipa S, Cavaleiro P, Atanasio G, Albuquerque I, Chaves P . Prognostic models for intracerebral hemorrhage: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018; 18(1):145. PMC: 6247734. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0613-8. View

5.
. Unmet Needs and Challenges in Clinical Research of Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Stroke. 2018; 49(5):1299-1307. PMC: 5916316. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019541. View