» Articles » PMID: 33544916

Predicting Response to a Community-based Educational Workshop on Incontinence Among Community-dwelling Older Women: Post Hoc Analysis of the CACTUS-D Trial

Overview
Date 2021 Feb 5
PMID 33544916
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: Our goal was to identify which women participating in an educational workshop on incontinence were most likely to benefit from it.

Methods: We included women aged 65 or older, living in the community, and not treated for incontinence despite reporting urinary leakage at least twice a week. The workshop's aims were to change beliefs about accepting incontinence as a normal part of ageing, explain that incontinence is not irreversible, and that solutions exist. We performed structured interviews at 6 and 12 months to assess impressions of improvement (PGI-I) and changes in both continence (ICIQ-FLUTS) and quality of life (I-QOL).

Results: The analysis included 392 women, 39% aged 80 or older and 57% with daily urinary incontinence. Twelve months after the workshop, 16% of women were "much better" (PGI-I); factors associated with impression of improvement were refusal to believe that incontinence is part of normal ageing at baseline and improvement of urinary symptoms. The median improvement was 4 points on the ICIQ-FLUTS and 8 on the I-QOL. Factors associated with a clinically significant improvement in urinary symptoms were more severe baseline urinary incontinence, obesity, and starting Kegel exercises. Factors associated with a clinically significant improvement in quality of life were a poor urinary quality of life at baseline and an age younger than 81 years.

Conclusions: A short, inexpensive and nonmedical intervention can change the mind-set and behavior of older women with incontinence who are not seeking care. A clinically significant improvement is possible even in women with severe symptoms.

Citing Articles

Psychological and educational interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community.

Drahota A, Udell J, Mackenzie H, Pugh M Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 10:CD013480.

PMID: 39360568 PMC: 11448480. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013480.pub2.


Efficacy and Safety of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections for the Treatment of Female Sexual Dysfunction and Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review.

Dankova I, Pyrgidis N, Tishukov M, Georgiadou E, Nigdelis M, Solomayer E Biomedicines. 2023; 11(11).

PMID: 38001920 PMC: 10669888. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11112919.


Predicting response to a community-based educational workshop on incontinence among community-dwelling older women: Post hoc analysis of the CACTUS-D trial.

Fritel X, van den Heuvel E, Wagg A, Ragot S, Tannenbaum C Neurourol Urodyn. 2021; 40(2):705-713.

PMID: 33544916 PMC: 8247852. DOI: 10.1002/nau.24614.

References
1.
Tannenbaum C, Brouillette J, Corcos J . Rating improvements in urinary incontinence: do patients and their physicians agree?. Age Ageing. 2008; 37(4):379-83. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afn108. View

2.
Bedretdinova D, Fritel X, Zins M, Ringa V . The Effect of Urinary Incontinence on Health-related Quality of Life: Is It Similar in Men and Women?. Urology. 2016; 91:83-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.12.034. View

3.
Locher J, Burgio K, Goode P, Roth D, Rodriguez E . Effects of age and causal attribution to aging on health-related behaviors associated with urinary incontinence in older women. Gerontologist. 2002; 42(4):515-21. PMC: 2759979. DOI: 10.1093/geront/42.4.515. View

4.
Fritel X, Dumoulin C . Incontinence: Stress urinary incontinence treatment--surgery first?. Nat Rev Urol. 2013; 11(1):10-1. DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2013.300. View

5.
Prochaska J, Velicer W . The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. 1997; 12(1):38-48. DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38. View