Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion (ACAF) Vs Posterior Laminoplasty for Multilevel Severe Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Retrospective Study Based on a Two-Year Follow-up

Overview

Journal Orthop Surg

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2021 Feb 1

PMID 33522136

Citations 13

Authors

Qing-Jie Kong

Xi Luo

Ying Tan

Jing-Chuan Sun

Yuan Wang

Lei Tan

Jian-Gang Shi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the clinical outcomes of anterior controllable antedisplacement fusion (ACAF), a new surgical technique, with laminoplasty for the treatment of multilevel severe cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) based on a 2-year follow-up.

Methods: Clinical data of 53 patients (21 by ACAF and 32 by laminoplasty) who have accepted surgery for treatment of cervical myelopathy caused by multilevel severe OPLL (occupying rate ≥ 50%) from March 2015 to March 2017 were retrospectively reviewed and compared between ACAF group and laminoplasty group. Operative time, blood loss, and complications of the two groups were recorded. Radiographic parameters were evaluated pre- and postoperatively: cervical lordosis on X-ray, space available for the cord (SAC) and the occupying ratio (OR) on computed tomography (CT), and the anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the spinal cord at the narrowest level and the spinal cord curvature on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring was used to evaluate neurologic recovery. Statistical analysis was conducted to analyze the differences between two groups. The Mann-Whitney U test and chi square test were used to compare categorical variables. unpaired t test was used to compare continuous data.

Results: All patients were followed up for at least 24 months. The operative time was longer in ACAF group (286.5 vs 178.2 min, P < 0.05). The blood loss showed no significant difference (291.6 vs 318.3 mL, P > 0.05). Less complications were observed in ACAF group than in laminoplasty group (one case [4.7%] of C5 palsy and one case [4.7%] of cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] leakage in ACAF group; four cases [12.5%] of C5 palsy, two cases [6.3%] of CSF leakage, and four cases [12.5%] of axial symptoms in laminoplasty group). The mean JOA score at last follow-up (14.6 vs 12.8, P < 0.05) and the improvement rate (IR) (63.8% vs 47.8%, P < 0.05) in ACAF group were superior to those in laminoplasty group significantly. The postoperative OR (16.7% vs 40.9%, P < 0.05), SAC (150.8 vs 110.5 mm , P < 0.05), AP spinal cord diameter (5.5 vs 4.2 mm, P < 0.05), and cervical lordosis (12.7° vs 4.7°, P < 0.05) were improved more considerably in ACAF group, with significant differences between two groups. Notably, the spinal cord on MRI showed a better curvature in ACAF group.

Conclusions: This study showed that ACAF is considered superior to laminoplasty for the treatment of multilevel severe OPLL as anterior direct decompression and better curvature of the spinal cord led to satisfactory neurologic outcomes and low complication rate.

Citing Articles

Comparison of anterior and posterior approaches for the treatment of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a meta-analysis of 28 cohort studies.

Zhou B, Yang G, Tang S, Li Y, Cao Z, Tan J Neurosurg Rev. 2025; 48(1):52.

PMID: 39812874 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-025-03192-y.

Comparison of anterior vs. posterior surgery for cervical myelopathy due to OPLL: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

He Q, Lv Z, Hu Y, Chen C, Zhan E, Wang X Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024; 86(11):6653-6664.

PMID: 39525719 PMC: 11543244. DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002556.

Anterior cervical controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion (ACAF) versus Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion (ACCF) for ossification of the cervical posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) in Chinese population: a systematic review and....

Wang M, Yang G, Zhou B, Cao Z, Li Y, Tan J Neurosurg Rev. 2024; 47(1):783.

PMID: 39392503 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-02977-x.

Biomechanical Comparison of Anterior Cervical Corpectomy Decompression and Fusion, Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion, and Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion in the Surgical Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic....

Kong Q, Li F, Yan C, Sun J, Sun P, Ou-Yang J Orthop Surg. 2024; 16(3):687-699.

PMID: 38316415 PMC: 10925493. DOI: 10.1111/os.13994.

Percutaneous Fully-endoscopic Anterior Transcorporeal Procedure for the Treatment of Isolated Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in the Cervical Spine: A Case Report.

Li J, Ao J, Hu X, Du Q, Qin J, Ji W Orthop Surg. 2023; 16(2):514-520.

PMID: 38111022 PMC: 10834199. DOI: 10.1111/os.13966.

References

Liu X, Min S, Zhang H, Zhou Z, Wang H, Jin A . Anterior corpectomy versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2013; 23(2):362-72. PMC: 3906468. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-3043-7. View

Minoda Y, Nakamura H, Konishi S, Nagayama R, Suzuki E, Yamano Y . Palsy of the C5 nerve root after midsagittal-splitting laminoplasty of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(11):1123-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000067261.83984.73. View

Fujimori T, Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Takenaka S, Kashii M, Kaito T . Long-term results of cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with an occupying ratio of 60% or more. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013; 39(1):58-67. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000054. View

Nouri A, Tetreault L, Singh A, Karadimas S, Fehlings M . Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Epidemiology, Genetics, and Pathogenesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 40(12):E675-93. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000913. View

Kaneyama S, Sumi M, Kanatani T, Kasahara K, Kanemura A, Takabatake M . Prospective study and multivariate analysis of the incidence of C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35(26):E1553-8. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ce873d. View

Edwards 2nd C, Heller J, Murakami H . Corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched-cohort analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(11):1168-75. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200206010-00007. View

Kim B, Yoon D, Shin H, Kim K, Yi S, Shin D . Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of anterior decompression and fusion for cervical compressive myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine J. 2015; 15(5):875-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.01.028. View

Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y, Ishii T, Yoshikawa H . C5 palsy after decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy: review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(21):2447-51. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000090833.96168.3F. View

Tsuzuki N, Abe R, Saiki K, Zhongshi L . Extradural tethering effect as one mechanism of radiculopathy complicating posterior decompression of the cervical spinal cord. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996; 21(2):203-11. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199601150-00008. View

10.

Nassr A, Eck J, Ponnappan R, Zanoun R, Donaldson 3rd W, Kang J . The incidence of C5 palsy after multilevel cervical decompression procedures: a review of 750 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012; 37(3):174-8. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318219cfe9. View

11.

Lee C, Jahng T, Hyun S, Kim K, Kim H . Expansive Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy Alone Versus Laminectomy and Fusion for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Is There a Difference in the Clinical Outcome and Sagittal Alignment?. Clin Spine Surg. 2014; 29(1):E9-15. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000058. View

12.

Liu X, Wang H, Zhou Z, Jin A . Anterior decompression and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical compressive myelopathy. Orthopedics. 2014; 37(2):e117-22. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20140124-12. View

13.

Abiola R, Rubery P, Mesfin A . Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Outcomes of Nonoperative and Operative Management. Global Spine J. 2016; 6(2):195-204. PMC: 4771496. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1556580. View

14.

Chen Y, Yang L, Liu Y, Yang H, Wang X, Chen D . Surgical results and prognostic factors of anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. PLoS One. 2014; 9(7):e102008. PMC: 4084983. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102008. View

15.

Liu X, Chen Y, Yang H, Li T, Xu B, Chen D . Expansive open-door laminoplasty versus laminectomy and instrumented fusion for cases with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and straight lordosis. Eur Spine J. 2016; 26(4):1173-1180. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4912-7. View

16.

Liu W, Ling Hu , Chou P, Liu M, Kan W, Wang J . Comparison of anterior decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty in the treatment of multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016; 12:675-85. PMC: 4853147. DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S100046. View

17.

Tani T, Ushida T, Ishida K, Iai H, Noguchi T, Yamamoto H . Relative safety of anterior microsurgical decompression versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy with a massive ossified posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(22):2491-8. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200211150-00013. View

18.

An H, Al-Shihabi L, Kurd M . Surgical treatment for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014; 22(7):420-9. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-22-07-420. View

19.

Epstein N . The surgical management of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in 51 patients. J Spinal Disord. 1993; 6(5):432-54; discussion 454-5. DOI: 10.1097/00002517-199306050-00011. View

20.

Sun J, Shi J, Xu X, Yang Y, Wang Y, Kong Q . Anterior controllable antidisplacement and fusion surgery for the treatment of multilevel severe ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with myelopathy: preliminary clinical results of a novel technique. Eur Spine J. 2017; 27(6):1469-1478. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5437-4. View