Prospective Study and Multivariate Analysis of the Incidence of C5 Palsy After Cervical Laminoplasty
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Study Design: A prospective comparative study about the incidence of postoperative C5 palsy and multivariate analysis of the risk factors of C5 palsy.
Objective: To clarify the risk factors of occurrence of C5 palsy after laminoplasty (LP) by comparing the 2 surgical procedures of open-door and double-door LP prospectively.
Summary Of Background Data: The incidence of C5 palsy has been reported to average 4.6%, and there has been no difference of the incidence among surgical procedures. However, there were only indirect retrospective studies.
Methods: A total of 146 patients who underwent the LP procedure between 2006 and 2007 were studied prospectively. In 2006, the patients were assigned to undergo the open-door LP, and in 2007, they were assigned to undergo the double-door LP. The incidence of postoperative C5 palsy was compared prospectively between these 2 LP procedures, and the risk factors of C5 palsy were detected with multivariate logistic regression analysis.
Results: Postoperative C5 palsy occurred in 7 of 73 cases after open-door LP (9.6%) and in 1 of 73 cases after double-door LP (1.4%). The incidence of C5 palsy after open-door LP was statistically higher than the one after double-door LP (P = 0.029), and open-door LP was recognized as a significant risk factor for postoperative C5 paralysis (odds ratio: 69.6, P = 0.043). In addition, ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) was recognized as a significant risk factor for postoperative C5 paralysis (odds ratio: 43.8, P = 0.048).
Conclusion: This study showed significant evidence indicating the higher risk of postoperative C5 palsy in open-door LP than double-door LP. Because OPLL as well as open-door LP were recognized as the risk factors of C5 palsy, asymmetric decompression by open-door LP might introduce imbalanced rotational movement of spinal cord and result in C5 palsy. We recommend double-door LP to minimize the postoperative C5 palsy, in particularly, if the patient has OPLL.
Qiao P, Zhang W, Xu T, Shao R, Tian R BMC Surg. 2024; 24(1):405.
PMID: 39709386 PMC: 11662773. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02722-7.
Wang S, Sun J, Han D, Fan J, Yu Mm Y, Yang Mm H Global Spine J. 2023; 14(7):2095-2105.
PMID: 37203443 PMC: 11418685. DOI: 10.1177/21925682231170607.
Fang Z, Li Y, Huang Z, Luo G, Yang H, Cheng H Front Surg. 2023; 10:1103804.
PMID: 36816008 PMC: 9934924. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1103804.
Li N, Zhao K, An Y, Yan K, Liu B, He D Ann Transl Med. 2022; 10(11):634.
PMID: 35813326 PMC: 9263768. DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-1730.
[Research progress of etiologies for C palsy after cervical decompression].
Guo C, Song X, Kong Q, Wang Y, Wu Y, Li W Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022; 36(3):376-379.
PMID: 35293181 PMC: 8923932. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202111072.