» Articles » PMID: 33507504

Mercury Interactions with Selenium and Sulfur and the Relevance of the Se:Hg Molar Ratio to Fish Consumption Advice

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2021 Jan 28
PMID 33507504
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Eating fish is often recommended as part of a healthful diet. However, fish, particularly large predatory fish, can contain significant levels of the highly toxic methylmercury (MeHg). Ocean fish in general also contain high levels of selenium (Se), which is reported to confer protection against toxicity of various metals including mercury (Hg). Se and Hg have a high mutual binding affinity, and each can reduce the toxicity of the other. This is an evolving area of extensive research and controversy with variable results in the animal and epidemiologic literature. MeHg is toxic to many organ systems through high affinity for -SH (thiol) ligands on enzymes and microtubules. Hg toxicity also causes oxidative damage particularly to neurons in the brain. Hg is a potent and apparently irreversible inhibitor of the selenoenzymes, glutathione peroxidases (GPX), and thioredoxin reductases (TXNRD) that are important antioxidants, each with a selenocysteine (SeCys) at the active site. Hg binding to the SeCys inhibits these enzymes, accounting in part for the oxidative damage that is an important manifestation of Hg toxicity, particularly if there is not a pool of excess Se to synthesize new enzymes. A molar excess of Se reflected in an Se:Hg molar ratio > 1 is often invoked as evidence that the Hg content can be discounted. Some recent papers now suggest that if the Se:Hg molar ratio exceeds 1:1, the fish is safe and the mercury concentration can be ignored. Such papers suggested that the molar ratio rather than the Hg concentration should be emphasized in fish advisories. This paper examines some of the limitations of current understanding of the Se:Hg molar ratio in guiding fish consumption advice; Se is certainly an important part of the Hg toxicity story, but it is not the whole story. We examine how Hg toxicity relates also to thiol binding. We suggest that a 1:1 molar ratio cannot be relied on because not all of the Se in fish or in the fish eater is available to interact with Hg. Moreover, in some fish, Se levels are sufficiently high to warrant concern about Se toxicity.

Citing Articles

Re-thinking the link between exposure to mercury and blood pressure.

Hu X, Loan A, Chan H Arch Toxicol. 2025; 99(2):481-512.

PMID: 39804370 PMC: 11775068. DOI: 10.1007/s00204-024-03919-8.


Chemical mixtures of mercury, PCBs, PFAS, and pesticides in freshwater fish in the US and the risks they pose for fish consumption.

Wu P, Foley C, Heiger-Bernays W, Chen C Environ Res. 2024; 266:120381.

PMID: 39577725 PMC: 11753927. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.120381.


Non-invasive biomonitoring of polar bear feces can be used to estimate concentrations of metals of concern in traditional food.

Eccles K, Boutet V, Branigan M, Dyck M, van Coeverden de Groot P, Lougheed S PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0305398.

PMID: 38917117 PMC: 11198741. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305398.


Mercury and selenium distribution in human brain tissue using synchrotron micro-X-ray fluorescence.

Webb A, Antipova O, Shughoury S, Farfel J, Bennett D, Du Y Metallomics. 2024; 16(5).

PMID: 38664065 PMC: 11064728. DOI: 10.1093/mtomcs/mfae018.


Health benefits of bluefin tuna consumption: () as a case study.

Chamorro F, Cassani L, Garcia-Oliveira P, Barral-Martinez M, Jorge A, Pereira A Front Nutr. 2024; 11:1340121.

PMID: 38628271 PMC: 11018964. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1340121.


References
1.
Gardner M, Zanic M, Howard J . Microtubule catastrophe and rescue. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2012; 25(1):14-22. PMC: 3556214. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2012.09.006. View

2.
Stratton A, Ericksen M, Harris T, Symmonds N, Silverstein T . Mercury(II) binds to both of chymotrypsin's histidines, causing inhibition followed by irreversible denaturation/aggregation. Protein Sci. 2016; 26(2):292-305. PMC: 5275735. DOI: 10.1002/pro.3082. View

3.
Schartup A, Thackray C, Qureshi A, Dassuncao C, Gillespie K, Hanke A . Climate change and overfishing increase neurotoxicant in marine predators. Nature. 2019; 572(7771):648-650. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1468-9. View

4.
Bonacker D, Stoiber T, Wang M, Bohm K, Prots I, Unger E . Genotoxicity of inorganic mercury salts based on disturbed microtubule function. Arch Toxicol. 2004; 78(10):575-83. DOI: 10.1007/s00204-004-0578-8. View

5.
Wang X, Horisberger J . Mercury binding site on Na+/K(+)-ATPase: a cysteine in the first transmembrane segment. Mol Pharmacol. 1996; 50(3):687-91. View