» Articles » PMID: 33503971

A Mathematical Model to Estimate Chemotherapy Concentration at the Tumor-Site and Predict Therapy Response in Colorectal Cancer Patients with Liver Metastases

Abstract

Chemotherapy remains a primary treatment for metastatic cancer, with tumor response being the benchmark outcome marker. However, therapeutic response in cancer is unpredictable due to heterogeneity in drug delivery from systemic circulation to solid tumors. In this proof-of-concept study, we evaluated chemotherapy concentration at the tumor-site and its association with therapy response by applying a mathematical model. By using pre-treatment imaging, clinical and biologic variables, and chemotherapy regimen to inform the model, we estimated tumor-site chemotherapy concentration in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases, who received treatment prior to surgical hepatic resection with curative-intent. The differential response to therapy in resected specimens, measured with the gold-standard Tumor Regression Grade (TRG; from 1, complete response to 5, no response) was examined, relative to the model predicted systemic and tumor-site chemotherapy concentrations. We found that the average calculated plasma concentration of the cytotoxic drug was essentially equivalent across patients exhibiting different TRGs, while the estimated tumor-site chemotherapeutic concentration (eTSCC) showed a quadratic decline from TRG = 1 to TRG = 5 ( < 0.001). The eTSCC was significantly lower than the observed plasma concentration and dropped by a factor of ~5 between patients with complete response (TRG = 1) and those with no response (TRG = 5), while the plasma concentration remained stable across TRG groups. TRG variations were driven and predicted by differences in tumor perfusion and eTSCC. If confirmed in carefully planned prospective studies, these findings will form the basis of a paradigm shift in the care of patients with potentially curable colorectal cancer and liver metastases.

Citing Articles

Polyester nanoparticles delivering chemotherapeutics: Learning from the past and looking to the future to enhance their clinical impact in tumor therapy.

Longobardi G, Moore T, Conte C, Ungaro F, Satchi-Fainaro R, Quaglia F Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2024; 16(5):e1990.

PMID: 39217459 PMC: 11670051. DOI: 10.1002/wnan.1990.


Tumour response following preoperative chemotherapy is affected by body mass index in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Song H, Zhou H, Gu P, Bao B, Sun Q, Mei T World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024; 16(2):331-342.

PMID: 38425385 PMC: 10900158. DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i2.331.


A modeling-based approach to optimize COVID-19 vaccine dosing schedules for improved protection.

Dogra P, Schiavone C, Wang Z, Ruiz-Ramirez J, Caserta S, Staquicini D JCI Insight. 2023; 8(13.

PMID: 37227783 PMC: 10371350. DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.169860.


Comparison of the immunomodulatory potential of platinum-based anti-cancer drugs and anthracyclins on human monocyte-derived cells.

Jenei V, Burai S, Molnar T, Kardos B, Macsik R, Toth M Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2022; 91(1):53-66.

PMID: 36451019 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-022-04497-1.


A modeling-based approach to optimize COVID-19 vaccine dosing schedules for improved protection.

Dogra P, Schiavone C, Wang Z, Ruiz-Ramirez J, Caserta S, Staquicini D medRxiv. 2022; .

PMID: 36415468 PMC: 9681049. DOI: 10.1101/2022.09.14.22279959.


References
1.
Swisher S, Hofstetter W, Wu T, Correa A, Ajani J, Komaki R . Proposed revision of the esophageal cancer staging system to accommodate pathologic response (pP) following preoperative chemoradiation (CRT). Ann Surg. 2005; 241(5):810-7. PMC: 1357136. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000161983.82345.85. View

2.
Choi M, Kim S, Kuh H . Penetration of paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil in multicellular layers of human colorectal cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 2011; 25(3):863-70. DOI: 10.3892/or.2011.1138. View

3.
Batchelor T, Gerstner E, Emblem K, Duda D, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Snuderl M . Improved tumor oxygenation and survival in glioblastoma patients who show increased blood perfusion after cediranib and chemoradiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(47):19059-64. PMC: 3839699. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1318022110. View

4.
Dogra P, Adolphi N, Wang Z, Lin Y, Butler K, Durfee P . Establishing the effects of mesoporous silica nanoparticle properties on in vivo disposition using imaging-based pharmacokinetics. Nat Commun. 2018; 9(1):4551. PMC: 6208419. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06730-z. View

5.
Rubbia-Brandt L, Giostra E, Brezault C, Roth A, Andres A, Audard V . Importance of histological tumor response assessment in predicting the outcome in patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by liver surgery. Ann Oncol. 2006; 18(2):299-304. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdl386. View