» Articles » PMID: 33502559

Development of the Asia Pacific Consortium on Osteoporosis (APCO) Framework: Clinical Standards of Care for the Screening, Diagnosis, and Management of Osteoporosis in the Asia-Pacific Region

Abstract

Purpose: Minimum clinical standards for assessment and management of osteoporosis are needed in the Asia-Pacific (AP) region to inform clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and to improve osteoporosis care. We present the framework of these clinical standards and describe its development.

Methods: We conducted a structured comparative analysis of existing CPGs in the AP region using a "5IQ" model (identification, investigation, information, intervention, integration, and quality). One-hundred data elements were extracted from each guideline. We then employed a four-round Delphi consensus process to structure the framework, identify key components of guidance, and develop clinical care standards.

Results: Eighteen guidelines were included. The 5IQ analysis demonstrated marked heterogeneity, notably in guidance on risk factors, the use of biochemical markers, self-care information for patients, indications for osteoporosis treatment, use of fracture risk assessment tools, and protocols for monitoring treatment. There was minimal guidance on long-term management plans or on strategies and systems for clinical quality improvement. Twenty-nine APCO members participated in the Delphi process, resulting in consensus on 16 clinical standards, with levels of attainment defined for those on identification and investigation of fragility fractures, vertebral fracture assessment, and inclusion of quality metrics in guidelines.

Conclusion: The 5IQ analysis confirmed previous anecdotal observations of marked heterogeneity of osteoporosis clinical guidelines in the AP region. The Framework provides practical, clear, and feasible recommendations for osteoporosis care and can be adapted for use in other such vastly diverse regions. Implementation of the standards is expected to significantly lessen the global burden of osteoporosis.

Citing Articles

An insight for Fracture Liaison Service implementation: a qualitative study from a developing country.

Tahmasbi F, Zabihiyeganeh M, Sadoughi F, Sheikhtaheri A Clin Rheumatol. 2024; 44(1):503-514.

PMID: 39604742 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-024-07208-8.


Simple clinical predictors for making directive decisions in osteoporosis screening for women: a cross-sectional study.

Leeyaphan J, Rojjananukulpong K, Intarasompun P, Peerakul Y J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):789.

PMID: 39581985 PMC: 11585944. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05287-6.


Automated Screening of Hip X-rays for Osteoporosis by Singh's Index Using Machine Learning Algorithms.

Kalavakonda V, Mohamed S, Abhay L, Muthu S Indian J Orthop. 2024; 58(10):1449-1457.

PMID: 39324087 PMC: 11420408. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-024-01246-9.


Evaluating compliance with the care standard of proactively assessing bone health in patients with diabetes: a pilot audit of practice across Asia by the Asia Pacific Consortium on Osteoporosis (APCO).

Chandran M, Aftab N, Amin A, Amphansap T, Bhadada S, Chadha M Arch Osteoporos. 2024; 19(1):48.

PMID: 38862849 PMC: 11166814. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-024-01399-y.


Secondary fracture prevention in primary care: a narrative review.

Wang M, Seibel M Osteoporos Int. 2024; 35(8):1359-1376.

PMID: 38652313 PMC: 11281980. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-024-07036-1.


References
1.
Miller P, Delmas P, Lindsay R, Watts N, Luckey M, Adachi J . Early responsiveness of women with osteoporosis to teriparatide after therapy with alendronate or risedronate. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008; 93(10):3785-93. PMC: 5399468. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2008-0353. View

2.
Wu C, Chen C, Chen P, Yang J, Chang P, Huang T . Identifying characteristics of an effective fracture liaison service: systematic literature review. Osteoporos Int. 2018; 29(5):1023-1047. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-017-4370-z. View

3.
Kanis J, Johnell O, De Laet C, Johansson H, Oden A, Delmas P . A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone. 2004; 35(2):375-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.03.024. View

4.
Kanis J, Johansson H, Harvey N, Gudnason V, Sigurdsson G, Siggeirsdottir K . Adjusting conventional FRAX estimates of fracture probability according to the recency of sentinel fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2020; 31(10):1817-1828. PMC: 7116089. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05517-7. View

5.
Ettinger B, San Martin J, Crans G, Pavo I . Differential effects of teriparatide on BMD after treatment with raloxifene or alendronate. J Bone Miner Res. 2004; 19(5):745-51. DOI: 10.1359/JBMR.040117. View