» Articles » PMID: 33501037

National Stereotypes and Robots' Perception: The "Made In" Effect

Overview
Journal Front Robot AI
Date 2021 Jan 27
PMID 33501037
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the near future, the human social environment worldwide might be populated by humanoid robots. The way we perceive these new social agents could depend on basic social psychological processes such as social categorization. Recent results indicate that humans can make use of social stereotypes when faced with robots based on their characterization as "male" or "female" and a perception of their group membership. However, the question of the application of nationality-based stereotypes to robots has not yet been studied. Given that humans attribute different levels of warmth and competence (the two universal dimensions of social perception) to individuals based in part on their nationality, we hypothesized that the way robots are perceived differs depending on their country of origin. In this study, participants had to evaluate four robots differing in their anthropomorphic shape. For each participant, these robots were presented as coming from one of four different countries selected for their level of perceived warmth and competence. Each robot was evaluated on their anthropomorphic and human traits. As expected, the country of origin's warmth and competence level biased the perception of robots in terms of the attribution of social and human traits. Our findings also indicated that these effects differed according to the extent to which the robots were anthropomorphically shaped. We discuss these results in relation to the way in which social constructs are applied to robots.

Citing Articles

The Role of Name, Origin, and Voice Accent in a Robot's Ethnic Identity.

Barfield J Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(19).

PMID: 39409461 PMC: 11479309. DOI: 10.3390/s24196421.


Qualitative study on domestic social robot adoption and associated security concerns among older adults in Slovenia.

Zvanut B, Mihelic A Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1343077.

PMID: 38333061 PMC: 10850379. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1343077.


Stereotypical nationality representations in HRI: perspectives from international young adults.

Cumbal R, Axelsson A, Mehta S, Engwall O Front Robot AI. 2023; 10:1264614.

PMID: 38077460 PMC: 10704018. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1264614.


Different models of anthropomorphism across cultures and ontological limits in current frameworks the integrative framework of anthropomorphism.

Spatola N, Marchesi S, Wykowska A Front Robot AI. 2022; 9:863319.

PMID: 36093211 PMC: 9452957. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2022.863319.

References
1.
Haslam N . Dehumanization: an integrative review. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006; 10(3):252-64. DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4. View

2.
Eyssel F, Kuchenbrandt D . Social categorization of social robots: anthropomorphism as a function of robot group membership. Br J Soc Psychol. 2011; 51(4):724-31. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02082.x. View

3.
Waytz A, Gray K, Epley N, Wegner D . Causes and consequences of mind perception. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010; 14(8):383-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.006. View

4.
Fiske S, Cuddy A, Glick P . Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006; 11(2):77-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005. View

5.
Rutland A, Hitti A, Mulvey K, Abrams D, Killen M . When does the in-group like the out-group? Bias among children as a function of group norms. Psychol Sci. 2015; 26(6):834-42. DOI: 10.1177/0956797615572758. View