» Articles » PMID: 29046651

Robots As Intentional Agents: Using Neuroscientific Methods to Make Robots Appear More Social

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2017 Oct 20
PMID 29046651
Citations 60
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Robots are increasingly envisaged as our future cohabitants. However, while considerable progress has been made in recent years in terms of their technological realization, the ability of robots to interact with humans in an intuitive and social way is still quite limited. An important challenge for social robotics is to determine how to design robots that can perceive the user's needs, feelings, and intentions, and adapt to users over a broad range of cognitive abilities. It is conceivable that if robots were able to adequately demonstrate these skills, humans would eventually accept them as social companions. We argue that the best way to achieve this is using a systematic experimental approach based on behavioral and physiological neuroscience methods such as motion/eye-tracking, electroencephalography, or functional near-infrared spectroscopy embedded in interactive human-robot paradigms. This approach requires understanding how humans interact with each other, how they perform tasks together and how they develop feelings of social connection over time, and using these insights to formulate design principles that make social robots attuned to the workings of the human brain. In this review, we put forward the argument that the likelihood of artificial agents being perceived as social companions can be increased by designing them in a way that they are perceived as intentional agents that activate areas in the human brain involved in social-cognitive processing. We first review literature related to social-cognitive processes and mechanisms involved in human-human interactions, and highlight the importance of perceiving others as intentional agents to activate these social brain areas. We then discuss how attribution of intentionality can positively affect human-robot interaction by (a) fostering feelings of social connection, empathy and prosociality, and by (b) enhancing performance on joint human-robot tasks. Lastly, we describe circumstances under which attribution of intentionality to robot agents might be disadvantageous, and discuss challenges associated with designing social robots that are inspired by neuroscientific principles.

Citing Articles

Intentional or Designed? The Impact of Stance Attribution on Cognitive Processing of Generative AI Service Failures.

Lv D, Sun R, Zhu Q, Zuo J, Qin S, Cheng Y Brain Sci. 2024; 14(10).

PMID: 39452044 PMC: 11506489. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14101032.


The impact of differential pricing subject on consumer behavior.

Chen J, Zhang Y, Wu Y BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1):431.

PMID: 39123225 PMC: 11311943. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-01928-x.


Nursing and human-computer interaction in healthcare robots for older people: An integrative review.

Dino M, Davidson P, Dion K, Szanton S, Ong I Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024; 4:100072.

PMID: 38745638 PMC: 11080351. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2022.100072.


Editorial: Neurocognitive features of human-robot and human-machine interaction.

Bossi F, Ciardo F, Mostafaoui G Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1394970.

PMID: 38550646 PMC: 10973145. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1394970.


Propensity to trust shapes perceptions of comforting touch between trustworthy human and robot partners.

Valori I, Fan Y, Jung M, Fairhurst M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):6747.

PMID: 38514732 PMC: 10957953. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57582-1.


References
1.
Fiske S, Cuddy A, Glick P . Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006; 11(2):77-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005. View

2.
Cullen H, Kanai R, Bahrami B, Rees G . Individual differences in anthropomorphic attributions and human brain structure. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013; 9(9):1276-80. PMC: 4158361. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nst109. View

3.
Wagner D, Kelley W, Heatherton T . Individual differences in the spontaneous recruitment of brain regions supporting mental state understanding when viewing natural social scenes. Cereb Cortex. 2011; 21(12):2788-96. PMC: 3209798. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhr074. View

4.
Wykowska A, Wiese E, Prosser A, Muller H . Beliefs about the minds of others influence how we process sensory information. PLoS One. 2014; 9(4):e94339. PMC: 3979768. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094339. View

5.
Grezes J, Berthoz S, Passingham R . Amygdala activation when one is the target of deceit: did he lie to you or to someone else?. Neuroimage. 2005; 30(2):601-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.038. View