» Articles » PMID: 33495589

Ensuring Effective Implementation of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Targets

Overview
Journal Nat Ecol Evol
Publisher Springer Nature
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Jan 26
PMID 33495589
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Biodiversity underpins the fundamental elements for human well-being including food security, human health and access to clean water. In 2010, the Aichi Targets were adopted by world leaders to address the crisis of biodiversity loss. Despite conservation efforts, none of the Aichi Targets have been fully met. However, comprehensive analysis of the reasons for failure in terms of implementation mechanisms is, to date, rare and limited in scope. Here, we demonstrate that most parties did not set effective national targets in accordance with the Aichi Targets, and investments, knowledge and accountability for biodiversity conservation have been inadequate to enable effective implementation. We recommend that the new global targets under the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework should be adopted by parties as the minimum national targets to achieve the 2050 Vision. We propose that financial resources for biodiversity conservation are substantially increased through a variety of sources, including the deployment of new economic instruments such as payments for ecosystem services. In addition, science-policy interfaces at all levels need to be strengthened to integrate scientific, Indigenous and local knowledge to support decision-making. We suggest that a compliance and accountability mechanism, based on monitoring systems, is created to provide transparent and credible review of parties' implementation of the new global targets.

Citing Articles

National biodiversity data infrastructures: ten essential functions for science, policy, and practice.

Guntsch A, Overmann J, Ebert B, Bonn A, Le Bras Y, Engel T Bioscience. 2025; 75(2):139-151.

PMID: 40060162 PMC: 11884780. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biae109.


Ambitions in national plans do not yet match bold international protection and restoration commitments.

Bell-James J, Watson J Nat Ecol Evol. 2025; 9(3):417-424.

PMID: 39962303 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-025-02636-4.


Multidimensional patterns of bird diversity and its driving forces in the Yangtze River Basin of China.

Liu W, Mu T, Yuan S, Yi J, Yu D, Li J Eco Environ Health. 2025; 4(1):100124.

PMID: 39925482 PMC: 11803227. DOI: 10.1016/j.eehl.2024.10.001.


Telecoupling cannot be ignored for the forest-based carbon market.

Williams B, Metzger J, Cho F, Phelan A, Lopez-Cubillos S, Bentley L Bioscience. 2025; 75(1):61-67.

PMID: 39911159 PMC: 11791526. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biae102.


Landscapes-a lens for assessing sustainability.

Dade M, Bonn A, Eigenbrod F, Felipe-Lucia M, Fisher B, Goldstein B Landsc Ecol. 2025; 40(2):28.

PMID: 39867571 PMC: 11754308. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-024-02007-7.


References
1.
Butchart S, Walpole M, Collen B, van Strien A, Scharlemann J, Almond R . Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science. 2010; 328(5982):1164-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1187512. View

2.
Tittensor D, Walpole M, Hill S, Boyce D, Britten G, Burgess N . A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets. Science. 2014; 346(6206):241-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.1257484. View

3.
Johnson C, Balmford A, Brook B, Buettel J, Galetti M, Guangchun L . Biodiversity losses and conservation responses in the Anthropocene. Science. 2017; 356(6335):270-275. DOI: 10.1126/science.aam9317. View

4.
Diaz S, Settele J, Brondizio E, Ngo H, Agard J, Arneth A . Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science. 2019; 366(6471). DOI: 10.1126/science.aax3100. View

5.
Whitehorn P, Navarro L, Schroter M, Fernandez M, Rotllan-Puig X, Marques A . Mainstreaming biodiversity: A review of national strategies. Biol Conserv. 2020; 235:157-163. PMC: 7083249. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.04.016. View