» Articles » PMID: 33475227

Largely Reduced OAR Doses, and Planning and Delivery Times for Challenging Robotic SBRT Cases, Obtained with a Novel Optimizer

Overview
Date 2021 Jan 21
PMID 33475227
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recently, VOLO™ was introduced as a new optimizer for CyberKnife® planning. In this study, we investigated possibilities to improve treatment plans for MLC-based prostate SBRT with enhanced peripheral zone dose while sparing the urethra, and central lung tumors, compared to existing Sequential Optimization (SO). The primary focus was on reducing OAR doses. For 25 prostate and 25 lung patients treated with SO plans, replanning with VOLO™ was performed with the same planning constraints. For equal PTV coverage, almost all OAR plan parameters were improved with VOLO™. For prostate patients, mean rectum and bladder doses were reduced by 34.2% (P < 0.001) and 23.5% (P < 0.001), with reductions in D of 3.9%, 11.0% and 3.1% for rectum, mucosa and bladder (all P ≤ 0.01). Urethra D and D were 3.8% and 3.0% lower (P ≤ 0.002). For lung patients, esophagus, main bronchus, trachea, and spinal cord D was reduced by 18.9%, 11.1%, 16.1%, and 13.2%, respectively (all P ≤ 0.01). Apart from the dosimetric advantages of VOLO™ planning, average reductions in MU, numbers of beams and nodes for prostate/lung were 48.7/32.8%, 26.5/7.9% and 13.4/7.9%, respectively (P ≤ 0.003). VOLO™ also resulted in reduced delivery times with mean/max reductions of: 27/43% (prostate) and 15/41% (lung), P  < 0.001. Planning times reduced from 6 h to 1.1 h and from 3 h to 1.7 h for prostate and lung, respectively. The new VOLO™ planning was highly superior to SO planning in terms of dosimetric plan quality, and planning and delivery times.

Citing Articles

Results of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy With CyberKnife-M6 for Primary and Metastatic Lung Cancer.

Sarihan S, Tunc S, Irem Z, Kahraman A, Ocakoglu G World J Oncol. 2024; 15(4):711-721.

PMID: 38993252 PMC: 11236372. DOI: 10.14740/wjon1865.


Dosimetric comparison of HyperArc and InCise MLC-based CyberKnife plans in treating single and multiple brain metastases.

Zhu L, Dong S, Sun L, Xiao Y, Zhong Y, Pan M J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024; 25(8):e14404.

PMID: 38803034 PMC: 11302820. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14404.


An analysis of the regional heterogeneity in tissue elasticity in lung cancer patients with COPD.

Lauria M, Stiehl B, Santhanam A, OConnell D, Naumann L, McNitt-Gray M Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1151867.

PMID: 37840998 PMC: 10575648. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1151867.


Technical feasibility of online adaptive stereotactic treatments in the abdomen on a robotic radiosurgery system.

Milder M, Magallon-Baro A, den Toom W, de Klerck E, Luthart L, Nuyttens J Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022; 23:103-108.

PMID: 35928600 PMC: 9344339. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.07.005.


Intrafraction Prostate Motion Management During Dose-Escalated Linac-Based Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

Panizza D, Faccenda V, Lucchini R, Daniotti M, Trivellato S, Caricato P Front Oncol. 2022; 12:883725.

PMID: 35463373 PMC: 9021501. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.883725.


References
1.
Wu B, Pang D, Lei S, Gatti J, Tong M, McNutt T . Improved robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy plan quality and planning efficacy for organ-confined prostate cancer utilizing overlap-volume histogram-driven planning methodology. Radiother Oncol. 2014; 112(2):221-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.07.009. View

2.
McNiven A, Sharpe M, Purdie T . A new metric for assessing IMRT modulation complexity and plan deliverability. Med Phys. 2010; 37(2):505-15. DOI: 10.1118/1.3276775. View

3.
Cassioli A, Unkelbach J . Aperture shape optimization for IMRT treatment planning. Phys Med Biol. 2012; 58(2):301-18. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/2/301. View

4.
Aluwini S, Van Rooij P, Hoogeman M, Kirkels W, Kolkman-Deurloo I, Bangma C . Stereotactic body radiotherapy with a focal boost to the MRI-visible tumor as monotherapy for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer: early results. Radiat Oncol. 2013; 8:84. PMC: 3641975. DOI: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-84. View

5.
Descovich M, Carrara M, Morlino S, Pinnaduwage D, Saltiel D, Pouliot J . Improving plan quality and consistency by standardization of dose constraints in prostate cancer patients treated with CyberKnife. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013; 14(5):162-72. PMC: 5714582. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v14i5.4333. View