» Articles » PMID: 33459029

In Search of an Optimal Subset of ECG Features to Augment the Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome at the Emergency Department

Overview
Date 2021 Jan 18
PMID 33459029
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background Classical ST-T waveform changes on standard 12-lead ECG have limited sensitivity in detecting acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the emergency department. Numerous novel ECG features have been previously proposed to augment clinicians' decision during patient evaluation, yet their clinical utility remains unclear. Methods and Results This was an observational study of consecutive patients evaluated for suspected ACS (Cohort 1 n=745, age 59±17, 42% female, 15% ACS; Cohort 2 n=499, age 59±16, 49% female, 18% ACS). Out of 554 temporal-spatial ECG waveform features, we used domain knowledge to select a subset of 65 physiology-driven features that are mechanistically linked to myocardial ischemia and compared their performance to a subset of 229 data-driven features selected by multiple machine learning algorithms. We then used random forest to select a final subset of 73 most important ECG features that had both data- and physiology-driven basis to ACS prediction and compared their performance to clinical experts. On testing set, a regularized logistic regression classifier based on the 73 hybrid features yielded a stable model that outperformed clinical experts in predicting ACS, with 10% to 29% of cases reclassified correctly. Metrics of nondipolar electrical dispersion (ie, circumferential ischemia), ventricular activation time (ie, transmural conduction delays), QRS and T axes and angles (ie, global remodeling), and principal component analysis ratio of ECG waveforms (ie, regional heterogeneity) played an important role in the improved reclassification performance. Conclusions We identified a subset of novel ECG features predictive of ACS with a fully interpretable model highly adaptable to clinical decision support applications. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT04237688.

Citing Articles

Electrocardiogram-based machine learning for risk stratification of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome.

Bouzid Z, Sejdic E, Martin-Gill C, Faramand Z, Frisch S, Alrawashdeh M Eur Heart J. 2025; 46(10):943-954.

PMID: 39804231 PMC: 11887543. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae880.


Artificial intelligence in healthcare: a scoping review of perceived threats to patient rights and safety.

Botha N, Segbedzi C, Dumahasi V, Maneen S, Kodom R, Tsedze I Arch Public Health. 2024; 82(1):188.

PMID: 39444019 PMC: 11515716. DOI: 10.1186/s13690-024-01414-1.


Prediction of emergency department presentations for acute coronary syndrome using a machine learning approach.

Kurucz V, Schenk J, Veelo D, Geerts B, Vlaar A, van der Ster B Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):23125.

PMID: 39367080 PMC: 11452569. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-73291-1.


Medical-informed machine learning: integrating prior knowledge into medical decision systems.

Sirocchi C, Bogliolo A, Montagna S BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024; 24(Suppl 4):186.

PMID: 38943085 PMC: 11212227. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-024-02582-4.


Pitfalls in Developing Machine Learning Models for Predicting Cardiovascular Diseases: Challenge and Solutions.

Cai Y, Gong D, Tang L, Cai Y, Li H, Jing T J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e47645.

PMID: 38869157 PMC: 11316160. DOI: 10.2196/47645.


References
1.
Al-Zaiti S, Callaway C, Kozik T, Carey M, Pelter M . Clinical Utility of Ventricular Repolarization Dispersion for Real-Time Detection of Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Emergency Departments. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015; 4(7). PMC: 4608089. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002057. View

2.
Al-Zaiti S, Martin-Gill C, Sejdic E, Alrawashdeh M, Callaway C . Rationale, development, and implementation of the Electrocardiographic Methods for the Prehospital Identification of Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Events (EMPIRE). J Electrocardiol. 2015; 48(6):921-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2015.08.014. View

3.
Green M, Bjork J, Forberg J, Ekelund U, Edenbrandt L, Ohlsson M . Comparison between neural networks and multiple logistic regression to predict acute coronary syndrome in the emergency room. Artif Intell Med. 2006; 38(3):305-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2006.07.006. View

4.
Al-Zaiti S, Alrawashdeh M, Martin-Gill C, Callaway C, Mortara D, Nemec J . Evaluation of beat-to-beat ventricular repolarization lability from standard 12-lead ECG during acute myocardial ischemia. J Electrocardiol. 2017; 50(6):717-724. PMC: 5696037. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2017.08.002. View

5.
Deo R . Machine Learning in Medicine. Circulation. 2015; 132(20):1920-30. PMC: 5831252. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.001593. View