» Articles » PMID: 33437865

Precision Medicine in Kidney Transplantation: Just Hype or a Realistic Hope?

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2021 Jan 13
PMID 33437865
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Desirable outcomes including rejection- and infection-free kidney transplantation are not guaranteed despite current strategies for immunosuppression and using prophylactic antimicrobial medications. Graft survival depends on factors beyond human leukocyte antigen matching such as the level of immunosuppression, infections, and management of other comorbidities. Risk stratification of transplant patients based on predisposing genetic modifiers and applying precision pharmacotherapy may help improving the transplant outcomes. Unlike certain fields such as oncology in which consistent attempts are being carried out to move away from the "error and trial approach," transplant medicine is lagging behind in implementing personalized immunosuppressive therapy. The need for maintaining a precarious balance between underimmunosuppression and overimmunosuppression coupled with adverse effects of medications calls for a gene-based guidance for precision pharmacotherapy in transplantation. Technologic advances in molecular genetics have led to increased accessibility of genetic tests at a reduced cost and have set the stage for widespread use of gene-based therapies in clinical care. Evidence-based guidelines available for precision pharmacotherapy have been proposed, including guidelines from Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium, the Pharmacogenomics Knowledge Base National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health, and the US Food and Drug Administration. In this review, we discuss the implications of pharmacogenetics and potential role for genetic variants-based risk stratification in kidney transplantation. A single score that provides overall genetic risk, a polygenic risk score, can be achieved by combining of allograft rejection/loss-associated variants carried by an individual and integrated into practice after clinical validation.

Citing Articles

Update on the reciprocal interference between immunosuppressive therapy and gut microbiota after kidney transplantation.

Salvadori M, Rosso G World J Transplant. 2024; 14(1):90194.

PMID: 38576749 PMC: 10989467. DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v14.i1.90194.


Pharmacomicrobiomics of Classical Immunosuppressant Drugs: A Systematic Review.

Manes A, Di Renzo T, Dodani L, Reale A, Gautiero C, Di Lauro M Biomedicines. 2023; 11(9).

PMID: 37761003 PMC: 10526314. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11092562.


Developing supervised machine learning algorithms to evaluate the therapeutic effect and laboratory-related adverse events of cyclosporine and tacrolimus in renal transplants.

Sridharan K, Shah S Int J Clin Pharm. 2023; 45(3):659-668.

PMID: 36848022 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-023-01545-5.


The Gut Microbiota in Kidney Transplantation: A Target for Personalized Therapy?.

Garcia-Martinez Y, Borriello M, Capolongo G, Ingrosso D, Perna A Biology (Basel). 2023; 12(2).

PMID: 36829442 PMC: 9952448. DOI: 10.3390/biology12020163.

References
1.
. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guidelines for CYP2C19 and Voriconazole Therapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018; 103(2):349. DOI: 10.1002/cpt.953. View

2.
Op den Buijsch R, Christiaans M, Stolk L, de Vries J, Cheung C, Undre N . Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics: influence of adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette B1 (ABCB1) and cytochrome (CYP) 3A polymorphisms. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2007; 21(4):427-35. DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2007.00504.x. View

3.
Gautreaux M, Freedman B . Genotypic variation and outcomes in kidney transplantation: donor and recipient effects. Kidney Int. 2013; 84(3):431-3. PMC: 3761401. DOI: 10.1038/ki.2013.167. View

4.
Marshall S, McLaren A, McKinney E, Bird T, Haldar N, Bunce M . Donor cytokine genotype influences the development of acute rejection after renal transplantation. Transplantation. 2001; 71(3):469-76. DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200102150-00022. View

5.
Vesell E, Page J . Genetic control of drug levels in man: phenylbutazone. Science. 1968; 159(3822):1479-80. DOI: 10.1126/science.159.3822.1479. View