» Articles » PMID: 33425868

High-Throughput Large-Scale Targeted Proteomics Assays for Quantifying Pathway Proteins in KT2440

Abstract

Targeted proteomics is a mass spectrometry-based protein quantification technique with high sensitivity, accuracy, and reproducibility. As a key component in the multi-omics toolbox of systems biology, targeted liquid chromatography-selected reaction monitoring (LC-SRM) measurements are critical for enzyme and pathway identification and design in metabolic engineering. To fulfill the increasing need for analyzing large sample sets with faster turnaround time in systems biology, high-throughput LC-SRM is greatly needed. Even though nanoflow LC-SRM has better sensitivity, it lacks the speed offered by microflow LC-SRM. Recent advancements in mass spectrometry instrumentation significantly enhance the scan speed and sensitivity of LC-SRM, thereby creating opportunities for applying the high speed of microflow LC-SRM without losing peptide multiplexing power or sacrificing sensitivity. Here, we studied the performance of microflow LC-SRM relative to nanoflow LC-SRM by monitoring 339 peptides representing 132 enzymes in KT2440 grown on various carbon sources. The results from the two LC-SRM platforms are highly correlated. In addition, the response curve study of 248 peptides demonstrates that microflow LC-SRM has comparable sensitivity for the majority of detected peptides and better mass spectrometry signal and chromatography stability than nanoflow LC-SRM.

Citing Articles

PeakDecoder enables machine learning-based metabolite annotation and accurate profiling in multidimensional mass spectrometry measurements.

Bilbao A, Munoz N, Kim J, Orton D, Gao Y, Poorey K Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):2461.

PMID: 37117207 PMC: 10147702. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37031-9.


Statistical and Computational Methods for Proteogenomic Data Analysis.

Song X Methods Mol Biol. 2023; 2629:271-303.

PMID: 36929082 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2986-4_13.


Monitoring and modelling the dynamics of the cellular glycolysis pathway: A review and future perspectives.

Patil N, Howe O, Cahill P, Byrne H Mol Metab. 2022; 66:101635.

PMID: 36379354 PMC: 9703637. DOI: 10.1016/j.molmet.2022.101635.


Quantitative proteomics characterization of cancer biomarkers and treatment.

Yang X, Shi Y, Zhang D, Xin R, Deng J, Wu T Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2021; 21:255-263.

PMID: 34095463 PMC: 8142045. DOI: 10.1016/j.omto.2021.04.006.

References
1.
Matzke M, Brown J, Gritsenko M, Metz T, Pounds J, Rodland K . A comparative analysis of computational approaches to relative protein quantification using peptide peak intensities in label-free LC-MS proteomics experiments. Proteomics. 2012; 13(3-4):493-503. PMC: 3775642. DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201200269. View

2.
Searle B, Egertson J, Bollinger J, Stergachis A, MacCoss M . Using Data Independent Acquisition (DIA) to Model High-responding Peptides for Targeted Proteomics Experiments. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2015; 14(9):2331-40. PMC: 4563719. DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M115.051300. View

3.
Kukurugya M, Mendonca C, Solhtalab M, Wilkes R, Thannhauser T, Aristilde L . Multi-omics analysis unravels a segregated metabolic flux network that tunes co-utilization of sugar and aromatic carbons in . J Biol Chem. 2019; 294(21):8464-8479. PMC: 6544863. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.007885. View

4.
Choi M, Chang C, Clough T, Broudy D, Killeen T, MacLean B . MSstats: an R package for statistical analysis of quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomic experiments. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30(17):2524-6. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu305. View

5.
Paley S, Parker K, Spaulding A, Tomb J, OMaille P, Karp P . The Omics Dashboard for interactive exploration of gene-expression data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017; 45(21):12113-12124. PMC: 5716103. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx910. View