» Articles » PMID: 33410892

Regression-based Analysis of Combined EEG and Eye-tracking Data: Theory and Applications

Overview
Journal J Vis
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2021 Jan 7
PMID 33410892
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Fixation-related potentials (FRPs), neural responses aligned to the end of saccades, are a promising tool for studying the dynamics of attention and cognition under natural viewing conditions. In the past, four methodological problems have complicated the analysis of such combined eye-tracking/electroencephalogram experiments: (1) the synchronization of data streams, (2) the removal of ocular artifacts, (3) the condition-specific temporal overlap between the brain responses evoked by consecutive fixations, and (4) the fact that numerous low-level stimulus and saccade properties also influence the postsaccadic neural responses. Although effective solutions exist for the first two problems, the latter two are only beginning to be addressed. In the current paper, we present and review a unified regression-based framework for FRP analysis that allows us to deconvolve overlapping potentials while also controlling for both linear and nonlinear confounds on the FRP waveform. An open software implementation is provided for all procedures. We then demonstrate the advantages of this proposed (non)linear deconvolution modeling approach for data from three commonly studied paradigms: face perception, scene viewing, and reading. First, for a traditional event-related potential (ERP) face recognition experiment, we show how this technique can separate stimulus ERPs from overlapping muscle and brain potentials produced by small (micro)saccades on the face. Second, in natural scene viewing, we model and isolate multiple nonlinear effects of saccade parameters on the FRP. Finally, for a natural sentence reading experiment using the boundary paradigm, we show how it is possible to study the neural correlates of parafoveal preview after removing spurious overlap effects caused by the associated difference in average fixation time. Our results suggest a principal way of measuring reliable eye movement-related brain activity during natural vision.

Citing Articles

Fixation-related potentials during a virtual navigation task: The influence of image statistics on early cortical processing.

Madison A, Callahan-Flintoft C, Thurman S, Hoffing R, Touryan J, Ries A Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025; 87(1):261-283.

PMID: 39849263 PMC: 11845547. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-03002-5.


Synchronization-based fusion of EEG and eye blink signals for enhanced decoding accuracy.

Alyan E, Arnau S, Reiser J, Wascher E Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):26918.

PMID: 39506076 PMC: 11541762. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-78542-9.


DERCo: A Dataset for Human Behaviour in Reading Comprehension Using EEG.

Quach B, Gurrin C, Healy G Sci Data. 2024; 11(1):1104.

PMID: 39384587 PMC: 11464549. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-024-03915-8.


Investigating the effects of context, visual working memory, and inhibitory control in hybrid visual search.

Barbosa A, Ruarte G, Ries A, Kamienkowski J, Ison M Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1436564.

PMID: 39257697 PMC: 11384996. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1436564.


Neural mechanism underlying preview effects and masked priming effects in visual word processing.

Huang X, Wong B, Ng H, Sommer W, Dimigen O, Maurer U Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024; 87(1):5-24.

PMID: 38956004 PMC: 11845427. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-02904-8.


References
1.
Everling S, Krappmann P, Flohr H . Cortical potentials preceding pro- and antisaccades in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997; 102(4):356-62. DOI: 10.1016/s0013-4694(96)96569-4. View

2.
Kliegl R, Wei P, Dambacher M, Yan M, Zhou X . Experimental Effects and Individual Differences in Linear Mixed Models: Estimating the Relationship between Spatial, Object, and Attraction Effects in Visual Attention. Front Psychol. 2011; 1:238. PMC: 3153842. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00238. View

3.
Xue J, Quan C, Li C, Yue J, Zhang C . A crucial temporal accuracy test of combining EEG and Tobii eye tracker. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96(13):e6444. PMC: 5380258. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006444. View

4.
Bennette C, Vickers A . Against quantiles: categorization of continuous variables in epidemiologic research, and its discontents. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012; 12:21. PMC: 3353173. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-21. View

5.
Altman D, Royston P . The cost of dichotomising continuous variables. BMJ. 2006; 332(7549):1080. PMC: 1458573. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.332.7549.1080. View