» Articles » PMID: 28353574

A Crucial Temporal Accuracy Test of Combining EEG and Tobii Eye Tracker

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2017 Mar 30
PMID 28353574
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Eye tracking and event-related potentials have been widely used in the field of cognitive psychology and neuroscience. Both techniques have the ability to refine cognitive models through a precise timeline description; nevertheless, they also have severe limitations. Combining measures of event-related potentials and eye movements can contribute to cognitive process capture, which provides the possibility to determine precisely when and in which order different cognitive operations occur. Combining of event-related potentials and eye movements has been recently conducted by synchronizing measures from an infrared eye tracker with an electroencephalograph to allow simultaneous data recording. Here, we describe in detail 4 types of co-registration methods for event-related potentials and eye movements on the Tobii platform. Moreover, the present investigation was designed to evaluate the temporal accuracy of data obtained using the 4 methods. We found that the method based on the Tobii Pro Analytics software development kit had a higher degree of temporal accuracy than the other co-registration methods. Furthermore, the reasons for the different temporal accuracies were assessed, and potential measures to correct clock drift were taken. General suggestions are made regarding timing in the co-registration of the electroencephalograph and eye tracker.

Citing Articles

Investigation of Information Overload in Electronic Health Records: Protocol for Usability Study.

Khairat S, Morelli J, Boynton M, Bice T, Gold J, Carson S JMIR Res Protoc. 2025; 14:e66127.

PMID: 39932774 PMC: 11862759. DOI: 10.2196/66127.


Simultaneous Dataset of Brain, Eye and Hand during Visuomotor Tasks.

Zhang H, Hu Y, Li Y, Zhang S, Li X, Zhao C Sci Data. 2025; 12(1):189.

PMID: 39890834 PMC: 11785794. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-024-04227-7.


The fundamentals of eye tracking part 3: How to choose an eye tracker.

Nystrom M, Hooge I, Hessels R, Andersson R, Hansen D, Johansson R Behav Res Methods. 2025; 57(2):67.

PMID: 39843609 PMC: 11754381. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02587-x.


Enhancing precision in human neuroscience.

Nebe S, Reutter M, Baker D, Bolte J, Domes G, Gamer M Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 37555830 PMC: 10411974. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.85980.


Timing errors and temporal uncertainty in clinical databases-A narrative review.

Goodwin A, Eytan D, Dixon W, Goodfellow S, Doherty Z, Greer R Front Digit Health. 2022; 4:932599.

PMID: 36060541 PMC: 9433547. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.932599.


References
1.
Richmond J, Nelson C . Relational memory during infancy: evidence from eye tracking. Dev Sci. 2009; 12(4):549-56. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00795.x. View

2.
Kliegl R, Dambacher M, Dimigen O, Jacobs A, Sommer W . Eye movements and brain electric potentials during reading. Psychol Res. 2011; 76(2):145-58. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0376-x. View

3.
Dimigen O, Sommer W, Hohlfeld A, Jacobs A, Kliegl R . Coregistration of eye movements and EEG in natural reading: analyses and review. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011; 140(4):552-72. DOI: 10.1037/a0023885. View

4.
Dambacher M, Kliegl R . Synchronizing timelines: relations between fixation durations and N400 amplitudes during sentence reading. Brain Res. 2007; 1155:147-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.04.027. View

5.
Amso D, Johnson S . Selection and inhibition in infancy: evidence from the spatial negative priming paradigm. Cognition. 2005; 95(2):B27-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.006. View