» Articles » PMID: 33407573

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Reference Values of Mitral and Tricuspid Annular Dimensions: the UK Biobank Cohort

Abstract

Background: Mitral valve (MV) and tricuspid valve (TV) apparatus geometry are essential to define mechanisms and etiologies of regurgitation and to inform surgical or transcatheter interventions. Given the increasing use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) for the evaluation of valvular heart disease, we aimed to establish CMR-derived age- and sex-specific reference values for mitral annular (MA) and tricuspid annular (TA) dimensions and tethering indices derived from truly healthy Caucasian adults.

Methods: 5065 consecutive UK Biobank participants underwent CMR using cine balanced steady-state free precession imaging at 1.5 T. Participants with non-Caucasian ethnicity, prevalent cardiovascular disease and other conditions known to affect cardiac chamber size and function were excluded. Absolute and indexed reference ranges for MA and TA diameters and tethering indices were stratified by gender and age (45-54, 55-64, 65-74 years).

Results: Overall, 721 (14.2%) truly healthy participants aged 45-74 years (54% women) formed the reference cohort. Absolute MA and TA diameters, MV tenting length and MV tenting area, were significantly larger in men. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) end-diastolic and end-systolic MA diameters in the 3-chamber view (anteroposterior diameter) were 2.9 ± 0.4 cm (1.5 ± 0.2 cm/m) and 3.3 ± 0.4 cm (1.7 ± 0.2 cm/m) in men, and 2.6 ± 0.4 cm (1.6 ± 0.2 cm/m) and 3.0 ± 0.4 cm (1.8 ± 0.2 cm/m) in women, respectively. Mean ± SD end-diastolic and end-systolic TA diameters in the 4-chamber view were 3.2 ± 0.5 cm (1.6 ± 0.3 cm/m) and 3.2 ± 0.5 cm (1.7 ± 0.3 cm/m) in men, and 2.9 ± 0.4 cm (1.7 ± 0.2 cm/m) and 2.8 ± 0.4 cm (1.7 ± 0.3 cm/m) in women, respectively. With advancing age, end-diastolic TA diameter became larger and posterior MV leaflet angle smaller in both sexes. Reproducibility of measurements was good to excellent with an inter-rater intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between 0.92 and 0.98 and an intra-rater ICC between 0.90 and 0.97.

Conclusions: We described age- and sex-specific reference ranges of MA and TA dimensions and tethering indices in the largest validated healthy Caucasian population. Reference ranges presented in this study may help to improve the distinction between normal and pathological states, prompting the identification of subjects that may benefit from advanced cardiac imaging for annular sizing and planning of valvular interventions.

Citing Articles

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in mitral valve disease.

Garg P, Pavon A, Penicka M, Uretsky S Eur Heart J. 2024; 46(7):606-619.

PMID: 39565911 PMC: 11825178. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae801.


Assessment of Tricuspid Regurgitation by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Current Role and Future Applications.

Pype L, Domenech-Ximenos B, Paelinck B, Sturkenboom N, Van De Heyning C J Clin Med. 2024; 13(15).

PMID: 39124748 PMC: 11312898. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13154481.


The evolving role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the assessment of mitral valve prolapse.

Vermes E, Altes A, Iacuzio L, Levy F, Bohbot Y, Renard C Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1093060.

PMID: 36937904 PMC: 10020178. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1093060.


Normal reference values of tricuspid annular dimensions and functional properties in healthy adults using three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (insights from the MAGYAR-Healthy Study).

Nemes A, Kormanyos A, Racz G, Ruzsa Z, Ambrus N, Lengyel C Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023; 13(1):121-132.

PMID: 36620137 PMC: 9816735. DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-88.


Multimodality Imaging Approach to Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.

Marrazzo G, Palermi S, Pastore F, Ragni M, De Luca M, Gambardella M J Clin Med. 2023; 12(1).

PMID: 36614955 PMC: 9821637. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12010154.


References
1.
Dreyfus G, Martin R, Chan K, Dulguerov F, Alexandrescu C . Functional tricuspid regurgitation: a need to revise our understanding. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 65(21):2331-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.011. View

2.
Solberg H . The theory of reference values Part 5. Statistical treatment of collected reference values. Determination of reference limits. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1983; 21(11):749-60. View

3.
Naoum C, Blanke P, Cavalcante J, Leipsic J . Cardiac Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Disease: Implications for Transcatheter Interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017; 10(3). DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005331. View

4.
Mihaila S, Muraru D, Piasentini E, Miglioranza M, Peluso D, Cucchini U . Quantitative analysis of mitral annular geometry and function in healthy volunteers using transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014; 27(8):846-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.04.017. View

5.
Di Mauro M, Gallina S, DAmico M, Izzicupo P, Lanuti P, Bascelli A . Functional mitral regurgitation: from normal to pathological anatomy of mitral valve. Int J Cardiol. 2011; 163(3):242-248. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.11.023. View