» Articles » PMID: 33403341

Evaluation of Mesial Root Canals of Mandibular Molars Obturated with Gutta-Percha and Resilon Techniques

Overview
Journal Eur Endod J
Publisher Kare Publishing
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2021 Jan 6
PMID 33403341
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the obturation of mesial root canals of mandibular first molars performed with different filling techniques and materials (gutta-percha and resilon).

Methods: Seventy-eight mesial root canals of human mandibular first molars were prepared using the K3 rotary system, and the apical preparation was set up to size 35.04. The root canals were obturated with single cone, System B, Thermafil and Real Seal 1 techniques using either gutta-percha/ThermaSeal Plus (n=13) or Resilon/Real Seal SE (n=13). Rhodamine B dye was incorporated into the sealers. Each specimen was horizontally sectioned at 2 milimeters (mm), 4 mm and 6 mm from the apex, and the samples were examined under a stereomicroscope to evaluate the presence and type of isthmuses and the percentage areas of gutta-percha/Resilon, sealer and voids. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) was used to evaluate the sealer penetration into dentinal tubules. The Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests were used to analyse the stereomicroscope data, while the ANOVA and Tukey tests were used to analyse the CLSM data (P<0.05).

Results: Thermafil and Real Seal 1 fillings showed more gutta-percha/Resilon and less sealer (P<0.05) at the 2 mm level, but the percentage of voids was similar in all groups (P>0.05). At the 4 mm level, more sealer (P<0.05) was found in the single cone groups using both materials. The System B groups exhibited better performance at the 6 mm level. The percentage of sealer penetration showed no statistically significant differences among the obturation techniques for all evaluated levels. Similar results (P>0.05) were found for both material/sealers.

Conclusion: None of the materials or techniques completely filled the mesial root canals of mandibular molars, but the plasticised techniques were more efficient. The obturations using both materials and sealers were similar.

Citing Articles

Penetrability of AH Plus Sealer into Dentinal Tubes after Retreatment Procedure with Rotary or Reciprocating Systems and Two Additional Cleaning Methods.

Martins M, Cavenago B, Bueno C, Martin A, Kato A, Vivan R Iran Endod J. 2023; 17(2):72-77.

PMID: 36704014 PMC: 9868973. DOI: 10.22037/iej.v17i2.26250.

References
1.
SantAnna-Junior A, Tanomaru-Filho M, Duarte M, Reis J, Guerreiro-Tanomaru J . Temperature changes in gutta-percha and Resilon cones induced by a thermomechanical compaction technique. J Endod. 2009; 35(6):879-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.03.009. View

2.
De-Deus G, Audi C, Murad C, Fidel S, Fidel R . Sealing ability of oval-shaped canals filled using the System B heat source with either gutta-percha or Resilon: an ex vivo study using a polymicrobial leakage model. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007; 104(4):e114-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.03.028. View

3.
DAlpino P, Pereira J, Svizero N, Rueggeberg F, Pashley D . Use of fluorescent compounds in assessing bonded resin-based restorations: a literature review. J Dent. 2006; 34(9):623-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.12.004. View

4.
Alicia Karr N, Baumgartner J, Marshall J . A comparison of gutta-percha and Resilon in the obturation of lateral grooves and depressions. J Endod. 2007; 33(6):749-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.02.017. View

5.
Schneider S . A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971; 32(2):271-5. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(71)90230-1. View