» Articles » PMID: 19548934

A Comparative Study of Physicochemical Properties of AH Plus, Epiphany, and Epiphany SE Root Canal Sealers

Overview
Journal Int Endod J
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2009 Jun 25
PMID 19548934
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To assess the physicochemical properties and the surface morphology of AH Plus, Epiphany, and Epiphany SE root canal sealers.

Methodology: Five samples of each material were employed for each test according to ANSI/ADA specification 57. The samples were assigned to four groups: (i) AH Plus; (ii) Epiphany; (iii) Epiphany + Thinning Resin; (iv) Epiphany SE. The distilled water used during the solubility test was submitted to spectrometry to verify the release of calcium ions. The morphologies of the external surface and the cross-section of the samples were analysed by means of a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Statistical analysis was performed by using One-Way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey-Kramer tests with the null hypothesis set as 5%.

Results: Setting time, flow and radiopacity results were in accordance with ANSI/ADA requirements whereas the dimensional change of all sealers and solubility of Epiphany did not fulfil ANSI/ADA protocols. AH Plus and Epiphany SE were similar in terms of flow, radiopacity, solubility and dimensional change. The spectrometry test revealed significant calcium ion release from Epiphany with and without the thinning resin. SEM analysis revealed essentially a homogeneous surface with compact layer and some rough areas.

Conclusions: Setting time, flow, and radiopacity tests conformed to ANSI/ADA standardization. The dimensional change in all groups and the solubility of Epiphany were greater than values considered acceptable, with higher amounts of calcium ion release. Epiphany SE revealed more organized, compacted, and homogeneous polymers in a reduced resin matrix when compared with the other groups.

Citing Articles

Nanoparticles modified bioceramic sealers on solubility, antimicrobial efficacy, pushout bond strength and marginal adaptation at apical-third of canal dentin.

Almutairi B, Alkhudhairy F PeerJ. 2025; 13:e18840.

PMID: 39950043 PMC: 11823649. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18840.


Evaluation of dimensional changes in EndoSeal mineral trioxide aggregate and AH Plus sealers using micro-computed tomography imaging.

Omidi S, Dehghani M, Alimohamadi M, Yazdani Charati J, Hashemi R Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2024; 21:33.

PMID: 39188394 PMC: 11346603.


Evaluation of the antibacterial and cytotoxic properties of TotalFill and NeoSEALER flo bioceramic sealers.

Sebastian S, El-Sayed W, Adtani P, Zaarour R, Nandakumar A, Elemam R J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024; 27(5):491-497.

PMID: 38939551 PMC: 11205165. DOI: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_103_24.


A comparative study of biological properties of three root canal sealers.

Yan Y, Li Y, Chi Y, Ji M, Shen Y, Zou L Clin Oral Investig. 2023; 28(1):11.

PMID: 38129367 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05402-7.


The Contribution of Various In Vitro Methodologies to Comprehending the Filling Ability of Root Canal Pastes in Primary Teeth.

El Hachem C, Chedid J, Nehme W, Kaloustian M, Ghosn N, Rabineau M Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(7).

PMID: 37508845 PMC: 10376379. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10070818.