» Articles » PMID: 33393449

Effects of Firefighting Hood Design, Laundering and Doffing on Smoke Protection, Heat Stress and Wearability

Overview
Journal Ergonomics
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Specialty Psychology
Date 2021 Jan 4
PMID 33393449
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Firefighter hoods must provide protection from elevated temperatures and products of combustion (e.g. particulate) while simultaneously being wearable (comfortable and not interfering with firefighting activities). The purpose of this study was to quantify the impact of (1) hood design (traditional knit hood vs particulate-blocking hood), (2) repeated laundering, and (3) hood removal method (traditional vs overhead doffing) on (a) protection from soot contamination on the neck, (b) heat stress and (c) wearability measures. Using a fireground exposure simulator, 24 firefighters performed firefighting activities in realistic smoke and heat conditions using a new knit hood, new particulate-blocking hood and laundered particulate-blocking hood. Overall, soot contamination levels measured from neck skin were lower when wearing the laundered particulate-blocking hoods compared to new knit hoods, and when using the overhead hood removal process. No significant differences in skin temperature, core temperature, heart rate or wearability measures were found between the hood conditions. The addition of a particulate-blocking layer to firefighters' traditional two-ply hood was found to reduce the PAH contamination reaching the neck but did not affect heat stress measurements or thermal perceptions. Modifying the process for hood removal resulted in a larger reduction in neck skin contamination than design modification. ANOVA: analysis of variance; B: new particulate-blocking hood and PPE (PPE configuration); FES: fireground exposure simulator; GI: gastrointestinal; K: new knit hood and PPE (PPE configuration); L: laundered particulate-blocking hood and PPE (PPE configuration); LOD: limit of detection; MLE: maximum likelihood estimation; NFPA: National fire protection association; PAH: polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon; PPE: personal protective equipment; SCBA: self-contained breathing apparatus; THL: total heat loss; TPP: thermal protective performance.

Citing Articles

Evaluating workplace protection factors (WPFs) of different firefighter PPE interface control measures for select volatile organic compounds (VOCs).

Kander M, Mayer A, Wilkinson A, Bertke S, Kesler R, Smith D J Occup Environ Hyg. 2024; 21(5):353-364.

PMID: 38560919 PMC: 11073914. DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2024.2323109.


Evaluating Exposure to VOCs and Naphthalene for Firefighters Wearing Different PPE Configurations through Measures in Air, Exhaled Breath, and Urine.

Mayer A, Fent K, Wilkinson A, Chen I, Siegel M, Toennis C Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(12).

PMID: 37372644 PMC: 10298633. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20126057.


Use of Preliminary Exposure Reduction Practices or Laundering to Mitigate Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Contamination on Firefighter Personal Protective Equipment Ensembles.

Wilkinson A, Fent K, Mayer A, Chen I, Kesler R, Kerber S Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(3).

PMID: 36767475 PMC: 9916157. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20032108.


Body Composition and Fitness Characteristics of Firefighters Participating in a Health and Wellness Program: Relationships and Descriptive Data.

Lockie R, Dulla J, Higuera D, Ross K, Orr R, Dawes J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(23).

PMID: 36497832 PMC: 9736830. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192315758.


Hierarchy of contamination control in the fire service: Review of exposure control options to reduce cancer risk.

Horn G, Fent K, Kerber S, Smith D J Occup Environ Hyg. 2022; 19(9):538-557.

PMID: 35853136 PMC: 9928012. DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2022.2100406.


References
1.
Horn G, Kesler R, Kerber S, Fent K, Schroeder T, Scott W . Thermal response to firefighting activities in residential structure fires: impact of job assignment and suppression tactic. Ergonomics. 2017; 61(3):404-419. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2017.1355072. View

2.
Kesler R, Ensari I, Bollaert R, Motl R, Hsiao-Wecksler E, Rosengren K . Physiological response to firefighting activities of various work cycles using extended duration and prototype SCBA. Ergonomics. 2017; 61(3):390-403. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2017.1360519. View

3.
Horn G, Kerber S, Lattz J, Kesler R, Smith D, Mayer A . Development of Fireground Exposure Simulator (FES) Prop for PPE Testing and Evaluation. Fire Technol. 2022; 56(5):2331-2344. PMC: 9170156. DOI: 10.1007/s10694-020-00981-3. View

4.
Baxter C, Hoffman J, Knipp M, Reponen T, Haynes E . Exposure of firefighters to particulates and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2014; 11(7):D85-91. PMC: 4653736. DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2014.890286. View

5.
Colburn D, Suyama J, Reis S, Morley J, Goss F, Chen Y . A comparison of cooling techniques in firefighters after a live burn evolution. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011; 15(2):226-32. PMC: 3086381. DOI: 10.3109/10903127.2010.545482. View