» Articles » PMID: 33392525

Metrics of Mechanical Chest Compression Device Use in Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2021 Jan 4
PMID 33392525
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) affects outcomes from cardiac arrest, yet manual CPR is difficult to administer. Although mechanical CPR (mCPR) devices offer high quality CPR, only limited data describe their deployment, their interaction with standard manual CPR (sCPR), and the consequent effects on chest compression continuity and patient outcomes. We sought to describe the interaction between sCPR and mCPR and the impact of the sCPR-mCPR transition upon outcomes in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

Methods: We analyzed all adult ventricular fibrillation OHCA treated by the Anchorage Fire Department (AFD) during calendar year 2016. AFD protocols include the immediate initiation of sCPR upon rescuer arrival and transition to mCPR, guided by patient status. We compared CPR timing, performance, and outcomes between those receiving sCPR only and those receiving sCPR transitioning to mCPR (sCPR + mCPR).

Results: All 19 sCPR-only patients achieved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after a median of 3.3 (interquartile range 2.2-5.1) minutes. Among 30 patients remaining pulseless after sCPR (median 6.9 [5.3-11.0] minutes), transition to mCPR occurred with a median chest compression interruption of 7 (5-13) seconds. Twenty-one of 30 sCPR + mCPR patients achieved ROSC after a median of 11.2 (5.7-23.8) additional minutes of mCPR. Survival differed between groups: sCPR only 14/19 (74%) versus sCPR + mCPR 13/30 (43%), = 0.045.

Conclusion: In this series, transition to mCPR occurred in patients unresponsive to initial sCPR with only brief interruptions in chest compressions. Assessment of mCPR must consider the interactions with sCPR.

Citing Articles

Injuries associated with mechanical chest compressions and active decompressions after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A subgroup analysis of non-survivors from a randomized study.

Petrovich P, Berve P, Barth-Heyerdahl Roald B, Kongsgard H, Stray-Pedersen A, Kramer-Johansen J Resusc Plus. 2023; 13:100362.

PMID: 36798487 PMC: 9926013. DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100362.


Finding the right pace: Addressing the transition from manual to mechanical compression devices for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Cisewski D, Caputo N J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021; 1(6):1222-1223.

PMID: 33392526 PMC: 7771798. DOI: 10.1002/emp2.12274.


Metrics of mechanical chest compression device use in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Levy M, Kern K, Yost D, Chapman F, Hardig B J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021; 1(6):1214-1221.

PMID: 33392525 PMC: 7771774. DOI: 10.1002/emp2.12184.

References
1.
Hostler D, Everson-Stewart S, Rea T, Stiell I, Callaway C, Kudenchuk P . Effect of real-time feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation outside hospital: prospective, cluster-randomised trial. BMJ. 2011; 342:d512. PMC: 3033623. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d512. View

2.
Yost D, Phillips R, Gonzales L, Lick C, Satterlee P, Levy M . Assessment of CPR interruptions from transthoracic impedance during use of the LUCAS™ mechanical chest compression system. Resuscitation. 2012; 83(8):961-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.01.019. View

3.
Levy M, Kern K, Yost D, Chapman F, Hardig B . Metrics of mechanical chest compression device use in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021; 1(6):1214-1221. PMC: 7771774. DOI: 10.1002/emp2.12184. View

4.
Wik L, Olsen J, Persse D, Sterz F, Lozano Jr M, Brouwer M . Manual vs. integrated automatic load-distributing band CPR with equal survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest. The randomized CIRC trial. Resuscitation. 2014; 85(6):741-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.03.005. View

5.
Schmidbauer S, Herlitz J, Karlsson T, Axelsson C, Friberg H . Use of automated chest compression devices after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Sweden. Resuscitation. 2017; 120:95-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.09.004. View